Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by gamelord, Jun 15, 2018.
Give us some examples in non- video form.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
No like I said earlier. The video is 20 mins, either watch it or not. You are asking me to transcribe a video I didn't make which is absurd and I have put far more effort into this topic already without reaping the slightest rewards.
If you can't sit still for 20 minutes then I dont expect you to put in the work to do accurate science on the matter.
No I'm not. I'm asking you to give us some clue what the video is about. If you can't do that, you don't seem to have much interest in discussing the topic.
I already told you it is about Egyptians having electricity in ancient times.
And you claimed there were examples. Give us some examples.
if if were a cliff to posit a sniff to hiff a clif ist if
the video, which you wont watch.
i say no more on the matter.
It would have been simpler if you had watched it. Then you might not have gone after that feral waterfowl.
The transcription is here: http://universeinsideyou.net/pyramids-true-purpose-finally-discovered/
To start, it’s important to comprehend the tremendous effort that went into creating these monuments. The Great Pyramid of Giza is one of among no less than 118 of these structures in Egypt alone – and that doesn’t even include those pyramids in other parts of the world. Given our current understanding of how early civilizations built their monuments, it would have taken no less than 20 years to build these so-called “tombs”– and that’s if no less than 20,000 workers worked DAILY. To this day, historians STILL can’t prove exactly HOW – or WHEN – they were built, since the blocks weigh an average of 2.5 tons, and we are boggled by how ropes, pulleys, and waterways somehow moved and lifted these enormous blocks. No one can duplicate the effort with the same materials; it remains a mystery.
This leads us to ask what resting place for the dead could possibly be so important that it would warrant such phenomenal effort, time, and precise engineering? Even without knowing that they have nothing in common with regular tombs, you only need to stand before them to realize… that’s a lot of work for a cadaver! Naturally, we make conclusions based on the assumption that ancient civilizations were more primitive than us… but what if intellectual evolution isn’t always linear… can advanced technology be lost, and rediscovered centuries later? Is it possible that an ancient culture had knowledge of – and used – electrical power?
And so forth...
Of course , here is the thing ; when the libraries of Alexandria and many others destroyed and looted .
We lost so much knowledge we will never know the full extent of OUR loss.
Loss of historical knowledge is to me a criminal offence . 2nd only to loss of life .
down tone intination on the back end of the words makes a semi depresive emotive content.
the subjective nature of the linguistic empathy lends to a concept of managed hyper activity control.
audio linguistic control normalcy ...
why does the visual aspect disrupt ?
can you watch a music video with the sound turned off while luistening to the audio of the egyptian video ?
true dualprocessing requires skill to learn how to manage like a super powered car.
learn or crash because the middle ground only last a very short time.
Are you putting my words into a pitch analyzer?
Mainly the posture. I have to either sit up or strain my neck to look at the screen. But also, the focus, it takes energy to visually process the video when I can rest my eyes.
I cannot watch a music video with the sound off. And modern music is so devoid of intrigue that I must watch the music video in order to feel entertained.
Thanks for this. I think we get the picture. Crap for the credulous.
Well you are a chemist so unless you have comment about electric engineering then your opinion on the validity of the video is rather wispy.
Like, can people seriously stop spamming my thread with speculative negging.
If you want to debate the science of this video, then debate the science, otherwise stop the spam.
Either by refuting or supporting the engineering claims made in the video.
I bet I know more about electricity than you. Chemists tend to know a certain amount of physics.
Seriously, this is a discussion forum. If you want to raise an issue for discussion, raise it in your own words, here on the forum, where we can debate it. Like most readers, I am not going to waste 20 minutes watching what on the face of it is a crap video for the credulous. You may not realise it, but those of us who have been around a while are wearily familiar with the pyramids being used for all manner of preposterous crank notions. This looks like just another one - and in fact one of the more ridiculous.
So yes, we will go on negging your thread until you can be bothered to put your arse in gear and express in words, for yourself, what the argument (if there is one) is, for us to read quickly here.
If you won't discuss the video, why should anybody be motivated to watch it?
He's actually too embarrassed to put forward the ideas mentioned in the video. Act in haste, repent ... nah, that's unlikely.
Separate names with a comma.