I'm taking it as a given - since this is only a mental experiment - each of the gazillion set ups is equal in energy content I'm not going to manipulate any of the gazillion cubes They are phantom images only Hence each mental image is at resting state Which is why this manipulating into another of the gazillion representations is NOT repeat NOT suitable to explain entropy since EACH of the states are equal REPEAT with minor correction Entropy needs the object to move to a lower energy level To reverse the entropy requires energy to be pumped back into the object In doing that you cause the object you are pumping the energy from to under go entropy Taking a real cube (not a mental image) and taking out the energy holding the blocks to by pulling them off the framework Remember it took energy to push the block into the framework THEN you can say the cube has lost energy It will take a energy input to reassemble the cube If you are plugging the blocks back onto the framework YOU are undergoing entropy loosing your energy which you will replace with the food you eat (your energy input pinched from the energy bound in the food being released into your body) Talking of this Coffee time Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
No, it doesn't. Entropy depends on what you define. That would be because you've defined some objects that can have different amounts of energy. I think you're talking there about a change in entropy, objects don't have entropy. Entropy isn't a process either. Taking a Rubik's cube apart will mean using energy (you have to do some work), whether you say the state it's in has more entropy or less, will depend on what you've defined. Note it's the state, not the cube or parts of it that you assign the entropy to. A gas at equilibrium has (a) maximum entropy (state). Thermodynamic entropy is is something that can't be known (so trivially isn't known) about a particular state, equilibrium, defined in terms of energy. That doesn't mean entropy is always defined that way.
I think I follow the following explanation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_entropy Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
That explanation you think you follow has this to say: "Classical thermodynamics is a physical theory which describes a "system" in terms of the thermodynamic variables of the system or its parts." Which is to say, thermodynamic systems are defined (bounded) by thermodynamic variables. Energy is one of the variables. But Claude Shannon showed that entropy doesn't have to be thermodynamically defined. We all have to live with it. In fact, entropy is defined once you define informational boundaries--what can be known vs what cannot, in the system. That thermodynamic entropy has units of Joules per degree Kelvin is just because the information has to be compatible. But actually dividing Joules by degrees Kelvin leaves what? Where are the physical units?