Although the combination of characters results in personality, there are some that cannot be combined, for example: aggressive and gentle, criminal and serious. Reactionism proposes that individuals know why they react in this or that way to a given situation. Make themself the question: Why do I react this way? The psychological reaction is not automatic, but the individual can choose between several ways to react.
archetypal personality formats started with jung https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jung now there is a pop science version which was turned into an attempted clinical version. the observer wishes to define a label the observers bias defines the range of possible outcomes that become the norms of that format. most personality formats are defined for a specific purpose. to fit inside a model that allows manipulation to fit inside a model that allows known variable outcomes in micro-managed situations cultural associative paradigms of projected norms of complicit behaviour models for group render. paradigms that define conceptual diseases and illness also define formats of associative models. there are 2 different sides of the coin 1 to help the patient 2 to manipulate the patient 3 false narrative of equative paradigms to illicit compliance to a bias established as a compulsory norm of culture doctrine. you sound a little DSM jung-esque are you stating your own opinion of a mix of conventional stereo types to find favour with corporate(business outcomes/compulsory absolutes for government associated conformity) personality compliance models ?
To know the human being psychologically it is necessary to label him. The individual has several labels: his name, his race, his sexual orientation, his religious beliefs, etc. Reactionism is only a vision of Psychology and does not attempt to be a mental therapy. If we know an individual we can label it in one or more of the forms of character.
http://sciforums.com/threads/the-sibilianism.160238/ http://sciforums.com/threads/the-sibilianism.160238/#post-3487667 what do you hope to achieve by creating this this thread ?
Sibilianism is more general than Reactionism. Sibilianism also includes: Philochrony (studies time), Intuinics (studies intuition) and Ambiphrenism (studies the bilaterality of the brain),
are you trawling for advanced psychotherapy of social engineering as a political ideological premise ? or sexual orientation stereo typing ?
In people the conflict between good and evil occurs, but in some people good is imposed on evil and in others occurs the opposite.
Behaviorism is a mechanistic psychology because it is based on classical conditioning and operant conditioning. It is an interventionism theory whose objective is to control individuals (animals and human beings). While Reactionism is limited to knowing how individual acts or reacts and then dialogue with him (people) to improve his responses.
