What is reality ?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Mark Turner, Aug 3, 2019.

  1. river

    Messages:
    12,743
    • Please do not troll.
    Before the Higgs particle is the quantum realm .
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,846
    Also of course the Higgs field is needed to give particles mass and was needed with the discovery of the Higgs particle in 2013 and was instrumental in Peter Higgs and Francois Englert receiving the Physics Nobel prize. It is necessary and gels with the particle Standard model. Obviously it exists at the quantum level and as far as I can tell, does not in anyway affect the vacuum state.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    c is the speed electromagnetic radiation propagates through space.

    Energy density state , high density , high energy spatial points , by natural laws of thermodynamics , transition to lower energy state points.



    I'm not making it up on the spot , I've thought about this for a while . I can make things up on the spot , I'm good like that .

    Gravity

    Indeed , we ourselves are the same substance .




    The information you give about science almost invariably strikes me as full of holes, and is often factually incorrect. And that's when you manage to express yourself clearly enough that I can make some sense out of what you're saying. Mostly, I find that the true things you say are the obvious things, and you quickly get lost as soon as you start talking about the scientific explanation for this or that.

    To tell you the truth, I forget now how a discussion about "what is reality" got into a debate about the speed of light and so on in the first place. At the very least, that suggests to me a lack of focus on the topic of the thread, which you started.[/QUOTE]
    Electricity is attracted to the lesser energy ahead of it while propagating a wire .

    I'm sorry I'm getting angry at my phone now , it took me what seemed ages to type all that , I'll return later , or I'll smash my phone up , horrible things .
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    12,743
    The quantum realm is really the arrangement of particles . Up , down , colours etc . To form all forms of matter .

    But upon what is the quantum world based ?
     
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,251
    I see.

    You made the claim that "The Higgs field has no basis in reality." You were asked to support your claim. You ignored that and tried to change the subject again.

    This is troll-like behaviour. You are officially warned.
     
  9. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,251
    As in another question you asked regarding black holes, I do not understand how you're using the word "based" here. Previously, I asked you to explain what you meant. You ignored that question.

    I will ask you again, for this one. What are you trying to get at when you ask what the "quantum world" is based on? What kind of explanation are you looking for?

    I mean, you've just described arrangements of particles etc. Is that not the "basis" you're looking for? If not, what are you looking for?
     
  10. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,251
    I'm so glad we agree about that.

    Was that supposed to be a sentence?

    Why did you ignore all but one of my questions there?

    Did you understand the questions I asked you? They didn't seem that difficult to me.

    You've thought about it for a while, and the most you've come up with in terms of an explanation is one word?

    That's not how science is done.

    There's your one-word explanation for why light comes out of a light bulb.

    So, walk me through the process. How does gravity get the job done, exactly? I'm really interested to find out.

    Well, there's one problem, right there. I have news for you: energy isn't a substance. You can't bottle it. You can't see it. You can't hold it. You can't be made of it.

    Why, when I ask you about the Higgs field, do you start talking about electricity in a wire?

    I am a bit reluctant to start in on your misconceptions about electricity at this point. No doubt that's another huge can of worms.

    I suppose I could start by asking you what you think electricity is. You say this electricity stuff - whatever it is - propagates in(?) wires and is attracted to some kind of energy. So, what is the electricity, and why is it attracted to the energy? You say "lesser energy". Where's the "greater energy"? Is that in the electricity stuff? Is greater energy attracted to lesser energy?

    Where are you getting your understanding of electricity from, in the first place? Where did you pick up this stuff about greater and lesser energies etc.? Have you ever taken a science class?

    If it's all a bit hard, don't feel obliged to post. Nobody is forcing you to post here.
     
  11. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    The easiest way to explain how gravity causes light to propagate through space is by considering fire . The reason fire always points up is because the high energy state of the fire is attracted to the lesser energy state above it and of the stratosphere .
    Now if you consider the high energy state of the Sun , the high energy is attracted to the lesser energy surrounding space of the Sun .
     
  12. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    Sorry if I'm being a bit blunt , I've two warnings now about my posts and don't want to mess up again . I think I should end today before I mess up further more .
     
  13. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,946
    Because you don't deserve either.
    You may - temporarily - get away with this sock puppet ruse but as Theorist/ Stevie Turner/ Constant-Theorist you've been banned from multiple science fora (including this one) for posting inane rubbish.
    Then don't bother: just go away.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  14. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    Ya what ?

    Beans spilling time about you ...
     
  15. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    I guess you understood this post ?

    The same process also applies to the laws of motion . An object remains in motion because the high energy , high density state of the object is attracted to the lesser energy space ahead of it .
    .

    Now I'm retiring from this because you all thing I'm some sort of joke , when the reality is I'm a better scientist .

    That is what reality is .
     
  16. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,515
    You mean blunt like this?: https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/can-religion-reject-this-science.217697/

    If readers want a laugh, try skipping to the later parts of the linked thread: Theorist in full flow.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2019
  17. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,846
    Bullshit, gobbldidook, word salad, nonsense. Have I made myself clear?

    You certainly are delusional, egocentric and ignorant.
    It appears that obviously Seattle and exchem were right about you. The evidence now sticks out like dog balls.
     
  19. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,150
    Well you have half of the paragraph correct

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Mark Turner likes this.
  20. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    As crazy as a fool , what's it to you ?

    Do you feel a need to pick on people with MH issues ?

    Shame on you !

    Some of you are quite delusional too .
     
  21. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    If none of you understand reality , why comment ?

    The reality is I'm correct and you're all in denial because of envy .
     
  22. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,515
    The person who wrote posts 217 and 282 in that thread expresses very similar ideas to yours in this present thread.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  23. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    I guess they must know what they're talking about then .
    I don't see any real objective arguments about what I've said in this thread , plus the one post I mentioned fire in , must make some sort of sense to somebody?
     

Share This Page