When do you consider someone "wealthy" or "rich"?

Discussion in 'Business & Economics' started by Seattle, Aug 8, 2019.

  1. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Like most American's, it was better before the Republicans trashed the US economy. And a lot better before I got the Iraq War loaded unto my national identity. (As the old joke put it: you know what they call a German who opposed the Nazi takeover of their country, did what a reasonable person would do to prevent evil from taking control of German industry and capabilities, politely objected to the degradation of their once wonderful country by thugs and corrupt swine?
    They call them "German". )

    But it's still pretty good - not as good as the Northern Cheyenne enjoyed in their heyday, but not bad at all.

    The tragedy of the wrecking of my favorite country by people who should know better, who have no excuse even for ignorance after the photos of Abu Ghraib, takes the glow off.
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2019
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  3. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    That's pretty bad. This capitalism doesn't sound so good. Let's just stop it.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  5. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    That's interesting. Mine hasn't really changed all that much regardless of the administration. Taxes and prices of many goods have come down since the days you speak of but otherwise it's about the same on a personal level. Inflation was the big problem when Reagan first came into office I remember as I was in grad school at the time and inflation was ridiculous (over 10 percent).

    Speaking of how the U.S. is viewed or how the U.S. behaves on the world stage, I'm not happy about that. I don't have a problem with the way it behaved in the Reagan years (other than the Iran-Contra affair). The Cold War ended, we didn't get into armed conflicts other than bombing Gadaffi's house.

    The obsession with war started with the Chaney bunch as I recall. The worst of what is going on now started with G.W. Bush. There's not a lot to like since then. Obama tried his best but the country is just too conservative to get much done.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  7. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    My taxes have gone up, and so have my neighbors's, and so have most Americans's. What little was cut from the Feds was added to the State and local levies, plus a bit extra, to cover the shortfalls. Also, the prices of the big ticket items I have to buy - medical care, housing, machinery repair and maintenance, especially - have gone up considerably.
    Bullshit. Republican Party line contrived nonsense aimed at avoiding the blame for the consequences of bad Republican Party governance and behavior.

    Not the country, in other words. It's not "the country's" fault. The country is solidly to the liberal, left, and libertarian, side of both major Parties - let alone the Republican Party, which is essentially an extremist rightwing cult, ideologically and behaviorally fascist, incompetent at governing.

    And "the country" was not sitting in Congress, acting as judges, or attending the strategy meetings of the major media outlets and their corporate support - the meetings where it was decided that wingnut welfare would dominate the media scene, and (before "me too") that Newt Gingrich and Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh and Hugh Hewitt and Charlie Sykes and David Brooks and Megan Kelly and Sean Hannity and on into Republican media infinity would be handed large piles of real US money and given jobs for life no matter what they said and did.

    The Republican Congress and Republican Supreme Court and Republican major media framing is what blocked Obama - nothing and nobody else played a significant role. "The country" was not even informed - to this day it's common to have people (especially Republican voters) deny it even happened

    The famous restaurant meeting of Republican Congressional leadership, immediately after Obama's assumption of power, where they openly and formally agreed to block everything Obama attempted to do for the next four years, regardless of what it was, and then blame him for not getting anything done (successfully among the wingnut faithful, as we see in the posts above), was just the second most flagrant event in the long list of examples. (Filibustering their own bills if Obama was going to sign them into law was the most flagrant - that was spectacular).

    Obama's mistake was to attempt reason and compromise and negotiated dealings with those corrupt clowns, to treat the Republican leadership with civility and respect - as if they were acting in good faith, and would keep promises, and in general act in the best interests of the United States, instead of acting as their long established nature (fascist scum) indicated they would.

    Because whatever troubles anyone here might have telling the rich apart from everybody else, the Republican Party leadership has no difficulty identifying its sugar daddies or figuring out how to keep them happy.

Share This Page