Xelasnave.1947
Valued Senior Member
I win in the main because I look at the situation from my opponents position.What I meant was, play the devil's advocate sometimes to test your beliefs. That is when you'll start to learn.
Alex
I win in the main because I look at the situation from my opponents position.What I meant was, play the devil's advocate sometimes to test your beliefs. That is when you'll start to learn.
Me tooI win in the main because I look at the situation from my opponents position.
Alex
Me too
But I tend to know there position.
A single event would indeed be rare.He'd just been there then then a single super rare event occurred which is creation and learning.
A single event would indeed be rare.
But there was no creation and learning is not singular.
Alex
Could there be creation and learning if certain things like food and land formations were infinite?
Art of war..know yourself know your enemy.
I always think about the other person...they seem so sure of themselves so what do they see that I may not...
But mostly I think how can they be so wrong particularly as they have had the priveldge of listening to my opinion.
Heck if I say something it must be right☺.
Alex
God is a construct of the mind and can only exist in the mind and although this god exists in the mind of many that does not mean it exists in reality.
You can't be sure of that Alex
There are a few things that I am reasonably sure about.
The non existence of a god outside the human imagination is but one.
I am reasonably sure that fire breathing dragons only exist inside the human imagination...I am reasonably sure that science is reliable and explains the universe better than any superstitious belief from the bronze age...and I could make a list but all items in the list would share in common the fact that I reject an unsupported claim that makes extordinary speculation with no evidence whatsoever.
In all the various threads re god here and elsewhere I have not yet seen any evidence of any god and one could think that if a god is real and everything is about god we would have just so much more than superstitious speculation and unevidenced unsupported belief.
How could God prove he exists?
You are soooo easily pleasedSomething that does not exist cant prove that it exists.
But lets go with the story and imagine there is this shy god who we can convince to offer a demonstration ... you want a demonstration... I think if a 500 foot tall human like figure appeared juggling 5 battleships while causing small Moons to appear and disappear ...well I think that would convince me somewhat.
Alex
If a 100 mile tall, white-bearded man with a staff appeared at the North Pole, and turned day into night with the snap of his fingers, and turned the Earth inside out with a blink, then "God" would rise to pretty near the top of my list of plausible explanations.How could God prove he exists?
And, it would turn out, you would have been wrong.As defined by me, ie he is human.
I am guessing any casino in the world be very happy to give you very long odds of it happeninggrant the possibility that it could happen
But lets go with the story and imagine there is this shy god who we can convince to offer a demonstration ... you want a demonstration... I think if a 500 foot tall human like figure appeared juggling 5 battleships while causing small Moons to appear and disappear ...well I think that would convince me somewhat.
If a 100 mile tall, white-bearded man with a staff appeared at the North Pole, and turned day into night with the snap of his fingers, and turned the Earth inside out with a blink, then "God" would rise to pretty near the top of my list of plausible explanations.
And, it would turn out, you would have been wrong.
The question was: how could you prove he exists?So what? Wrong that God is not human because you've made something up and said, "You would be proved wrong?". I defined a God, and got nonsense back.
The question was: how could you prove he exists?
It would be considered proven (at least by me) if that were to happen.
My point is that: while it is well-known that one cannot prove a negative, it is possible that a positive could be proven, given nominal circumstances.
Nobody can prove that Russell's Teapot does not orbit somewhere out beyond Mars.
But it is possible (were it to be the case) that there really is a teapot floating out there. It might be found, and would thus be proven.
IOW: it is possible to prove God exists, were he to appear.