Why does the government hide UFO's?

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by darksidZz, Apr 19, 2016.

  1. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    This thread is about UFO's, no need to start a new thread .

    So you are unable to distinguish the difference between a saucer shaped object and a ballon shaped object .
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    So you are able to produce evidence of the government recovering weather balloons?
    This thread is about UFOs.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    Well since this happened before you or I were born, I think the only rational answer is: No. And neither are you.

    I guess we'll have to look at the reports. Ah. The reports say it was a weather balloon.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    Nice twist dave; it won't work .

    Roswell is about a saucer crash .
     
  8. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    The original report was of a saucer craft .
     
  9. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,919
    Because the damn officials charged with investigation take bribes from the aliens.
    And Sherlock would agree.
    Gee...even the razor will give you that answer.
    Money River it always just about the money and an aliens gold is as good as the next Man's.
    Alex
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2016
  10. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    It does NOT say "saucer craft" at all.
    It says "flying disc".

    Balloons can be disc-shaped, and they fly.


    And that, my friends, with a subtle twist of words, is how myths are created - and believed.


    By the way:

    "The military decided to conceal the true purpose of the crashed device – nuclear
    test
    monitoring
    "

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_incident
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2016
  11. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
  12. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    Don't be silly dave.
     
  14. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    That's three for three.

    You claimed the Roswell incident was a UFO. It wasn't - as evidenced.
    You claimed it was a saucer craft. It wasn't. As evidenced.
    You claimed balloons can't be disc-shaped. They can - as evidenced.
     
  15. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    So a metalic saucer object behaves as a ballon?

    Is that your logic ?
     
  16. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    Ooh! I forgot one!

    You claimed it was a saucer "craft". It isn't - as evidenced.

    No where it is referred to as a metallic object.

    That's five out of five.

    Stop making stuff up.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2016
  17. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    No you simply can not understand the difference between a saucer metallic obeject and a ballon.

    And you believe what the government tells you . even when the RAAF originally tells you it was a saucer that crashed .

    You have become irrational .

    You only believe what was told to you the next day. Not what was originally reported .
     
  18. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    Complain all you want; I have shown you a metallic, saucer-shaped balloon.

    Can you explain to our readers the difference between a metallic saucer-shaped balloon and a metallic saucer-shaped balloon?


    Interesting you say that. You posted the article. You believed it was evidence for your claim. Do you dismiss your own evidence now?

    It is also interesting that you invoke the word irrational.
    In a discussion where
    - I am presenting extant, irrefutable facts (mostly that your claims are demonstrable falsehoods, spoken by you - I can go back over them again if you like)...
    - and your best response is "that's silly".

    Methinks that world irrational is weighing heavily upon your mind right now.

    How much more of this public whipping can you take?
     
  19. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    Analyze the architecture from your post #1149 to a saucer , whats the difference ?

    Think about it ..... the ballon has no reverse structure .

    The ballon has no inverse structure built into it .

    Inotherwords the ballon has no underneath structure . no inverse structure attached to the top .
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    What does a "saucer" have to do with anything? It is never mentioned in the article. You made it up out of whole cloth.
    What is the value in discussing the structure of something you made up?

    I'm afraid I don't l know what a "reverse structure" or an "inverse structure" might be. These are not things.

    Regardless, the thing they recovered at Roswell does not have them either.

    I guess that's just further evidence it's not ... whatever you're imagining.
     
  21. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484

    In otherwords; take the parachute and attach it so you have a top and bottom .
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,640
    Why make stuff up? The picture shows a flat, metallic balloon. They exist. They are not only an extremely plausible explanation, they nicely match the report.

    Why have you abandoned the evidence? It is the only link to an event than occurred before you or I were born.

    Strange, when there's something that supports what you want to believe, you are all hot on it. "Read this!" you cry.
    When it turns out it does not support what you want to believe, you're all "I've changed my mind. Look at what I've imagined!"


    Stop. It's been refuted. It's a dead horse you're kicking. This is causing me pain on your behalf.
     
  23. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,484
    you believe what supports what is given to you by the government ; the next day .

    There is no way that one can confuse a saucer craft with a ballon.
     

Share This Page