Why Hypewaders Suspended Quadraphonics

/not comprehnding this.:shake::zzz:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Because her example is based on events involving foreigners, not local Haredis; a point you have completely avoided in your response. I appreciate your comments about their segregation; you might also ask why they're like that.

It's amusing to watch your absurd quest for dogma here. You're grasping for straws here in a particularly enraged way, and coming up short as a result; your sole trick here seems to be to try to invoke the charge of anti-Semitism. Quadra's criticism was of Sam's suspiciously immovable standpoint, for which she's received criticism from other people. But you want to twist this into anti-Semitism on my part now? Underhanded and low.

This is the most bizarre twist of this discussion yet, because of this next point of yours:

Wow. First off, how am I "being" an anti-semitic argument?

Second: do you really have no idea what sarcasm is? I have to disregard this one, because if I believed you actually believed this, I would also have to accept that you were mentally unfit, or else just unhinged. This is a bizarre line of argument in the extreme. I was amused at quadra's impression of Sam - which, by the way Bells, I know for a fact is meant precisely as that - and then you thought that I thought the massacre of Palestinians was funny? Then, when that avenue of yours fails (because...seriously, now), you actually think you can turn the argument around and claim that I am now being anti-Semitic? (Which is doubly confusing, because Sam's just told me that anti-Semitism doesn't exist.)

Look, I'm not being cheeky when I ask this, because I want to give you a fair shake and not pick on you here: is English your first language? I'm asking this honestly. I want to be completely sure here that I'm not being unfair.

Again: you simply don't understand. Or choose not to. You seemingly don't understand the concept of premeditation vis-a-vis the point that I was making (that certain handlers wanted a riot); or you choose not to. You really actually think I'm trying to justify the deaths of the protestors with the song? Is that how you really perceive the incident? If I believed this, I would truly pity you.

:yawn: Keep awaiting. You have comported yourself with nothing but poor form, insinuation, ad hominem, dishonesty and/or intellectual disconnect throughout these proceedings, as if the above was part of Quadra's sarcastic rant. Why would I bother discussing this now? You clearly don't follow how the argument works. Pointless and childish.

Oh. That's odd. And here I'd thought it was Jewish people I was okay with the massacre of. But now it's Muslims. I wish you'd make up your mind.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Yes, because that's precisely what he was implying. Brilliantly deducted.

Yes, because I understand his intent. You might dislike his format - hype does, and he and I differ on our appreciation of it, but hype I expect understands the meaning of his sarcasm - but you can hardly pretend that he actually meant it in the way you intend.

Hehe. Really? This raises several issues. First off, you are tragically, sadly, unbelievably wrong on all counts, as I've demonstrated quite easily. You don't follow either myself or Quadra, and it's more than a little difficult to believe that this outrage is real. First, I'm somehow supporting the massacre of Jews, but then by the end of the post it's the Muslims. So which is it then? Who knows? It's surprising that such a conversation should go on in the present day; but here we are.

The next is what you plan to "do about it". You've hinted at dire retribution for disagreeing with you before, and it isn't the first time, so I'm curious: what is it you have in mind for my apparent crimes of hatred, above?

Sigh - sorry again, hype. I know I said I would back away slowly, but Bells is pushing me a bit on this, and it's hard to just drop this kind of thing and walk away when one's being attacked. Could you move the OT stuff to another forum? Not Human Science, though, for the obvious reason. Cesspool probably best. Sorry to be a pain.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You've already implied a couple of times that "things aren't looking so good for me"; I take this as the suggestion that you would like to "moderate" my posts. Makes me suspicious.

So, ergo: yes. I don't trust you. Sorry. :shrug:

 

Oh, and: I will read up on the Haredim. But I will remind you that these incidents apparently mostly involve outsiders; a point which Sam also supports, ironically enough.

 

Well, I'd thought from your earlier writings that you didn't want it here. I expect I was misinformed, then.

 

No; I attribute what you said about my personality to poor judgement, overreaction and possibly even to dishonesty.

Oh, I didn't say you haven't moderated fairly; only that I suspected you wouldn't do so in my case. You haven't been fair throughout this debate, so I thought the same might well occur elsewhere.

Now: should I ask for links or support for your accusations against me within 24 hours? Or are certain people allowed to troll?

 

Oh: here's your link, BTW. Check the line at the end. Illuminating, isn't it?

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2572166&postcount=200

 

I have set up an alternate thread where you may continue to impugn me and threaten my account: http://www.sciforums.com/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=87.

Let's review to there, and let the evil of the day be sufficient thereof, as far as this thread goes.

 

I thank you, and my bleeding eyeballs thank you. And nobody got told it's past his bedtime (which it is mine)
/burn
/crash

 

That's all very nice, I'm sure: would you mind terribly moving it to here?:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=102570

This is the newly designated "Hating Geoff" space, or until such time as a permanent thread can be erected.

 

Well, you could just copy and paste it. I'm sure it's quite simple.

And the other mod is "indisposed" at the moment.

 

The only local Jews are the Mizrahi. The rest are all immigrants or first generation descendents of such. But make no mistake. They are NOT tourists or visitors, but settlers.

From Larry Derfners column in The Jerusalem Post:

 

Well, I can't wait any longer. Bedtime. Your link, madam:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2572166&postcount=200

Pay especial attention to the last line. You are saying this was not your intent? Let's hear about this: response to the other thread if you please. And if you must go to the adminstration, so be it. It seems likely that I would do likewise; you claim my suspicion is unwarranted. Very well: your accusations are, similarly, unwarranted. I will advise the administration of this issue via PM immediately: not that I'm trying to make things worse, but rather in that I feel whoever "shoots second" on these issues generally makes little impression. I do not wish to take any undue advantage, but at the same time I feel I should have my say. And, ultimately, this might be approaching an administrative issue anyway. Who knows? Perhaps they'll judge for you in toto.

 

@Bells

Originally posted by Bells
"Right. So if you or Lucy or Quad make comments about sending all Jews to the ovens, we can ignore it as a joke, because you don't mean it? Right?"

Do you mind keeping my name out of this you fake bitch!!!

If you want to use that analogy perhaps you should point to Sam.

I don't want you fucking using my name to illustrate your insipid point of view.

And YES I AM telling you to fuck off and leave me alone.

Most of all don't fucking use my name for anything around here and I will ignore you as the pretentious housewife you are.

...After all we don't belong to the same 'species'.