Discussion in 'Human Science' started by visceral_instinct, Aug 11, 2009.
Do you stand behind that, or is this just random drivel as well ?
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
NORSEFIRE wat a dumbass question.
Ideemany and all who I deem undesireable tobreed, to not breed lmfao of course that dosn't mean to justgoabout their life and do whatever thefuck theywanna do only thatthey realize how stupid fuck they r for ruining their life
I theoretically would stand behind it, because it will lead to paradise. What objections could you possibly have?
Are you serious ? Do you wish that they would bring your ideas, as presented in post 58, into practice ?
What objection is there?
Such ideas will lead to harmony, prosperity, order, and happiness. Do you object to those things?
Don't you want to cut down the population size?
Can you answer the question please ?
I am, but you are trying to insinuate that those things are "bad"
They aren't. Yes, I would support it, because it will solve our human problems.
Then you're a fascist. You're on ignore.
Just about everyone under the sun:shrug:
Objections to happiness! Dear Pete, how absurd can people get!
I'm sure he knows the answer in some form.
Look who's talking.
i know precisely who's talking bock bock!!!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Yes, you, with your threads updating us on the pizza you order and the toenail you cut, and nobody cares
lol Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Sorry Norse, I'll take you off ignore. I was too rash.
If you don't mind, I will not be discussing your fascist ideas though.
Yes, of course I agree with that. Don't you think it would be selfish to bring to the world a genetically unfit child, only to witness it struggle with its shortcomings?
It was more about the 'undesirable people'.
I think that by undesired he meant somehow impaired.
I don't think so.
And even if so, why would you deny someone that lost a leg in a car accident the right to have children ?
So not having children is selfless?
I dunno. I guess people automatically assume that females want to have children as their means of contributing to society. It's old fashioned, and really archaic, but I do know some people who still think that way.
I would argue it is actually selfish to have children. Many end up trying to mold them into clones of themselves, only to realise that they are their own individuals. I was blessed to have parents realize this early on.
Separate names with a comma.