Why is sciforums traffic so low now?

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by Magical Realist, Apr 7, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    Pathetic? No, it's plain unadulterated fact, and it is here in black and white my little piss ant friend!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    You denying it is certainly being cornered and with your pants down to boot.
    Let me again reinforce a fact: [not-withstanding your nonsensical conspiracy claims.]
    We have no conclusive or extraordinary evidence that shows the Earth has ever been visited by any ETI, time travellers and/or interdimensional beings.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    pad, you are simply not comprehending, your so-called " no substantial evidence " which you are screaming as a fact, is simply your own piss-ant opinion, which is incorrect in its up-most. you are simply playing your pathetic game at this point.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shakes head)-- carry on with your pathetic hypocritical, contradicting, shenanigans.
    " A shame you are so dishonest though, as others have been inferring. "-- my god, your hypocrisy does not end, does it?
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,697
    Better that 20 myths be believed than one real thing be disbelieved, I guess.

    That is, by the way pretty much the defintion of gullibility.

    The one I pointed out did not have any back up evidence. Yet you called it compelling. Like you call all the other ones compelling.
    Whch means we are obliged to acknowledge that you are unable to tell compelling from not compelling.
    Unable to tell evidence from faith.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,284
    There would have to be collusion because most all the stories are repeated across many different websites and many ufologists know each other. There's no way such a massive deception could be going on without collusion.
     
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    No game being played this end.....
    What I state as fact is certainly fact:
    No conclusive evidence exists that support any visitations by Aliens. :shrug:
    You appear to be getting as desperate as the god often gets with his pseudoscience crank nonsense, at this stage.
     
  9. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,697
    I'll put my money on the guy who backs up his statements over the guy who hasn't contributed anything but trolling for as long as I've been around.

    He is correct. There is no conclusive evidence.
     
    sweetpea likes this.
  10. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,284
    I don't know what you're talking about. And frankly your petty attempts at trapping me have failed again. So move along troll. No gloating over my demise today.
     
  11. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    how is it not faith for your end? how do you even know you are correct? again, i bet you are one of those individuals whom does not have access and experience with such things, correct? then explain how you are also not being hypocritical due to your own words above. i actually came here to tell MR that MR does not need to prove anything to all of you. MR also has the right to post whatever this sector allows. i do not understand why all of you come to these topics and ridicule MR, like as if any of you have any inkling of any of it at all-- what a pathetic ffucking joke you all are.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shrugs)
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2016
  12. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,697
    Of course there is.
    Here's a trivial example just for fun: internet memes are a common theme played out by innmerable unrelated strangers.
     
  13. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,284
    How much evidence have you looked at? Do you even know what conclusive evidence would look like?
     
    krash661 likes this.
  14. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,284
    No there isn't, and I just told you why, which you edited out.
     
  15. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,697
    As you admit, they've simply gone over your head. But not over anyone else's.
     
  16. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    comical-- more pathetic manipulation attempts pad?-- how typical.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shrugs)
     
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,697
    Heh. While quoting my example of that very thing. How perfectly self-contradictory.

    The correct expression, for next time you have no response, is nuh-uh!
     
  18. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    and as obvious as you make it, i will define piss-ant for you since you are clueless of its meaning.

    piss·ant

    piss·ant [píss ànt]
    or piss antU.S.
    n
    (plural piss·ants) (plural piss ants)
    1. an offensive term for somebody who pays too much attention to small details
    2. an offensive term for somebody regarded as being of no importance, significance, or consequence


    adj
    1. an offensive term meaning paying too much attention to small details
    2. an offensive term meaning regarded as being of no importance, significance, or consequence


    [Mid-17th century. Originally "ant"; from the urinous smell of anthills]
     
  19. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,284
    And so we end on a trolling insult about my stupidity. Is this your version of a happy ending?
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,697
    Woah. I didn't call you stupid. You freely admitted you didn't understand what I said, despite the fact that I quoted your posts directly. That's on you mate.
     
  21. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    comical-- what would that even be(as the topic clearly show)?-- what a ffucking joke you are also.
    and why exactly are you here typing in this topic?
    except you have no clue of what you speak of-- which i am 100% sure of.
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,697
    Heh. Comical. Carry on.
     
  23. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    except you still have not answered the question of " according to whom?"
    " You appear to be getting as desperate "-- you appear to be attempting your usual manipulation attempts.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shrugs)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page