Why is there matter in universe ?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Dicart, Jun 13, 2022.

  1. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    Hello.

    The question is : How it comes that if you have equaly amount of matter and anti-matter "in the same pot" you finaly end with, only matter, or only anti-matter ?

    Any clue ?
    The answer is at least very obvious but i would like your feedback.

    Thank yoo.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. mathman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,942
    Statement is false?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,925
    Don't bother.
    Dicart is a troll - sorry, a crow - who has demonstrated a very poor grasp of science and that he is only here to stroke his own ego by flogging his fanciful ideas.

    He will demonstrate this momentarily.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,478
    Agree
    One of the two, matter / antimatter, finished up with a bit more of itself hence was not eliminated. We live in the Universe made of the uneliminated stuff

    WHY one lot of stuff became more than the other stuff is the question to ask

    Agree

    Wait a bit for the fanciful idea

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    false ?
     
  9. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    Looks like the only thing you are good for is to wait that somebody that have used his brain give you something you can then repeat like a parrot.
    What a pathetic life !
     
  10. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,585
    You on the other hand make up silly stuff.
     
  11. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,189
    I give up. Please tell us the very obvious answer, Dicart.
     
  12. mathman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,942
    Answer to original question. Current theory has slightly different decay paths for matter particles and mirrors leading to excess matter, Details are unknown.
     
  13. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    Ok.
    If a have a big dog, as big as i am.
    Let say some like this one :

    I am walking with my dog in the park (without a leash, because i am a bad boy) and my dog is running around.
    We do some virtual fighting, he win i win, an even game.

    Suddenly i realize that my dog has disappeared !
    But, "where is my dog ?"

    1. He must have disappeared due to the fight we did, and now i am weaker.
    Se he is dead and i shortly escaped from the same fate, altougth i am seriously wounded.

    2. He is lost.

    I suppose 2 is true because i know we have equal strength.
    Yes, i could use hypothesis 1, but it would need some complex new considerations (spining universe etc etc etc, i dont lack of imagination but i know that the simpliest is the smartest).

    So, antimatter is lost.
    Now, i try to find some scientist who did some serious work that could lead to this hypothesis :
    Oh : Jean-Pierre Petit !
    The one who pretend to have (perhaps) be in contact with some ET or at least have received some usefull informations that has permitted him to developp the JANUS univers Model (it is not a theory, it is a Model).
    Very honest and smart guy if can give my opinion.
    Here is the presentation of his work :

    He speak very bad english, but i can not blame him. i write a very poor english too (i never speak english, it would sounds like AHHGrrrrrGHGGGG aaaaaaaaKKIO OMOHUU

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    )

    And yes, just to do the presentation of The Man.
    He is the one who discovered the real nature of Black Holes.
    There are no black holes, there are what he has named PlugStars (he has done the scientific demonstration of that)
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2022
  14. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,585
    I think your English is quite good, you do a good job of getting your point across.
    Are you saying that there is large amounts of anti-matter in the universe? If that is what you are saying that does not seem true since there should be a lot of rather huge explosions going on when the anti-matter and matter encounter each other, which we do not see.
     
  15. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    You should at leat view the video of Jean-Pierre Petit (JPP)
    I ensure you that you will learn new things (you can also view other videos of JPP and you will understand why we think there are "back holes" (errors coming from the two Schwarzschild papers the scientists have not really understand (or never be aware of it because of the translation problem (95 years for the second paper of Schwarzchild)), but in fact (using the negativ mass concept), we have some special stars (he named them Plugstars) who can not create any singularity.

    Here, he do the demonstration using Einstein's theory for the behaviour of the mass (me and my dog) :


    JPP :
    Any positiv mass concentration attract anaything (i mean positiv or negativ mass)
    Conversly, negativ mass concentration reppels anything (reppels a positiv test mass or a negatv test mass).
    + against + : Attraction
    - against - : Repulsion
    + against - : Runaway (the negativ mass,is attracted to the positiv mass while the positiv mass try to escape the negativ mass)

    I agree... this looks very weird (runaway effect will be very difficult to be taken in account... it looks like a dog chasing around his own tail)

    Now the JANUS Cosmological Model :

    + Against + : Attraction
    - Against - : Attraction
    - Against + (opposite mass) : Repulsion

    And he doesent make some fantasy : It is some scientific deduction using Einstein's theory.

    So.
    Where is my dog ?
    - Against + =====>>>>> REPULSION.

    My dog is gone (there exists an other called "JANUS" univers close to our own).

    PS: The link to the video (like the first one with the dog) should have taken in account the time stamp (i used the link at the position of the video option to create the link in youtube), but it looks like it is not taken in account in the post so add ?t=820 to the end of the link of the video)
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2022
  16. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,585
    I found the video way too tedious to watch. I skipped forward a bit and he began talking about negative mass. Negative mass is pseudoscience so at that point I stopped watching. The guy is not a physicist he is an engineer, I'm an engineer too, so I can tell you if you want to understand physics listen to physicist, not engineers.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  17. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    You are a funny guy, for sure.

    When Dirac discovered the possibility that there could be "antimatter", using the equations (like Mr Jean-Pierre Petit) he was wondering himsef if he should take it in account.
    He dident say : OOhh i am doing pseudosience ? Mathematic say that but i can't believe it !
    No. He only accepted the fact, doing nothing else than publishing his work.

    By chance, someone observed something like antimatter (he dident know it was antimatter because he dident know the Dirac's equations).
    But someone remembered Dirac's studies and tried : And if those observations could be related to Dirac's studies ?
    Now, anyone knows that antimatter exists.

    Pseudoscience ?
    Haha, you are a funny guy.
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2022
  18. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,925
    So, the obvious answer is: antimatter is your dog.
    Got it.
     
  19. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,585
    Anti-matter is real but negative mass is pseudoscience. Anti-matter and regular matter both are effected by gravity exactly the same, anti-matter is not negative mass.
     
  20. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    Sure.
    And you are Stan Laurel.
     
  21. Dicart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    465
    And how do you know that ?

    Very very funny guy.
    You already know all of that, and trying to answer thoses questions is ... pseudoscience (because it is what you think, and what you think is what science is... haha ).
    So, can you explain me why scientists are actually doing some very expensive experimentation, trying to find out how matter and the antimatter react to gravity ?
    They are doing pseudoscience too ?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBAR_experiment
     
  22. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,585
    Because that is what mainstream physics says.
    You have an odd sense of humor.
    No of course not, but of course they are not looking for negative mass.
     
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,925
    I'm not the one making the jokes.
    You said the answer to matter is "obvious", and then literally told us a fanciful tale about a fight with a dog.
    Is science a joke to you?

    How do we know antimatter is real? Because we are making it in labs. Antiprotons are antimatter. Positrons are antimatter.

    How do we know negative matter is pseudoscience? Because there is no evidence for it, either physical or theoretical. It is not explicitly ruled out by the physics we know, but then again, neither are other speculative particles such as tachyons.
     

Share This Page