I see you're still confusing religious belief with other ideologies. But just for the sake of argument, I am going to treat atheists like turds and see how that pans out. Meanwhile now niggers call each other niggers. And Zorastrianism which did not die out with Islam [it just moved house] is now dying out not because people don't believe in god, but its embarassing when you can't attend your own kid's thread ceremony because you're not a full blood Zorastrian and hence banned from the temple [which perversely, your kid can go to]. Consanguineous religions fall out of favor because people take the more liberal approach when choices are available, perhaps in Persia, they could see the benefits of a religious belief where your blood line did not determine your place in society and who you were allowed to marry. The inbreeders ran around for 2000 years saving what they could of their pure bloodline, but, not surprisingly, as you said, racism has a short lifetime and they are finally breaking up their elite corps. The Jews have been trying to save what they can of their ethnocentric religion, but if you send an American Jew to Jerusalem, he would be repulsed by the notion that women cannot walk on the same side of the street [even though the top Jewish leaders in the US are all Zionists, Jews themselves have abandoned the notion that you have to be born of a Jewish mother to qualify for their cadre]. So thats another narrow minded religion that is losing its relevance as its followers fall out one by one. So its no surprise that in places where these religions reigned, people overwhelmingly voted for Islam. So, as you see I agree with the movement of society away from racism. However, if you are saying that theism is racism then you are surely deluded. The position of Islam per se on treatment of unbelievers is one of tolerance [see Surah al Kafiroon]. So yes, unbelievers should be free to lack belief. Thats not bigotry, thats pragmatism.
Wrong, the article was about a handful of Jews in Britain calling for a boycott of the Nazis the day after Hitler was made dictator of Germany. One British tabloid called it a "declaration of war" because tabloids know that sensational titles sell better. Why shouldn't someone be allowed to call for a boycott against a racist dictator? Hitler had openly announced his hatred of Jews for years prior to 1933, and repeatedly called for a "Jew free" Germany in his speeches. Your claim that his hatred was 'caused' by a 1933 call for a boycott, after years of racist speeches and his seizing dictatorial power, reveals your complete ignorance of history. Bigots will always find (poor) excuses for bigotry.
That is not the position of the Islam we have to deal with. Ideal Islam is no doubt a fascinating topic, but actual Islam is more directly relevant here.
Thats not a problem with Islam, thats a problem with human nature [see actual democracy, actual socialism, actual secular humanism, etc]
? Those are all problems with socialism, democracy, etc. And likewise, problems with Islam. Human nature is a given.
I disagree. For example, you have people moving from Brooklyn, New York to this: Thats human nature. This is what is sneered at in NY. So they simply go underground then resurface. Where its alright to express their views. And the "assimilated" Jews that Michael referred to are right there behind them: So yeah, its human nature
No, I'm comparing one intolerant irrational ideology with another intolerant irrational ideology. What's not to get? Unless they happen to fellow Arab and want to be polytheists. Then it's Kill kilL kiLL kILL KILL KILL KILL KILL! Remember SAM? *But thems were polytheists*... Ooo how the song changes again and again post hoc rational to attempt to apologize this intolerant ideology into some palatable. Well, someone has to so it may as well be you! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Then you should have no problem with its expression, Bishie. I didn't expect you'd actually understand the point, but que sera sera. Your three chances add up to 150%. Where have you attained such math expertise?
good to see you read point made: both sides share discontent prior to war (equality is set) Sounds like the new slogan i keep reading "boycott israel" same with Netanyahu claiming (no loyalty, no citizenship) during his campaign i am living in history, while you are reading opinions i can see what is happening right now like suggesting what happened years ago substantiates what is happening right now on this earth
It is not "human nature" to refuse to fly in an airplane with women, or flip a light switch on Saturday. That is Orthodox Jewish custom, and most humans are not Orthodox Jews. And them being "underground" ( a strange way to describe being tolerant or courteous enough to be overlooked in small numbers, and in turn being tolerated and treated with courtesy), rather than overtly dominating and enforcing the cultural milieu in which others must make their way, would be better for the rest of us, yes?
In other words, it is better for them to follow what we consider right, since we don't want to follow what they consider right.
I also said that there are some which die natural deaths [and thats alright too]. Although I guess we have to make an exception for Jews. The orthodox never had gender segregated streets in Mumbai.
if you want to feel oppressed, walk thru Compton at night in any country, you can experience oppression but when contries themselves oppress people with arms in a war like nature, then a holocaust can exist, right before your eyes and some don't even know it
like the thread title ensues? kind of sick isn't it? here we are over here on this side of the lake, and propaganda is what 'we the people' are reading, rather than comprehending the issues involved; like OPPRESSION of a body of people based on ignorance. funny how bad the ignorance is, eh?