This is an unbalanced arguement, and yet it's not inexorably beyond or comprehensative to any real discussion. What amuses me, is how many are systemic towards the negative solutions to such a thread, which has by no more the best interests out for everyone.
You must be smoking crack. Ashura has made some excellent contributions to ethics, politics, and psychology.
They latch on to every kind of politically correct pseudoscience that has come up in the last 40 years.
Look... bottom line is, is that there is a catalogue of science out there... and only a limited amount of views at this site. A bit of biasm on one subject certainly goes a mile to furlongs when one presents a theory. This may not be against the general concept of reality, but it does refute without good example a means of communative production.
Who me Ben... If i am banned, then let it be. It certainly won't chip anything off my shoulder, other than i wish i could stay around here... because i have many friends here... ... apart from those who do not actually wish to speak of science from a wide spectra.
People who are interested in this diverse ``catalogue of science'' that Reiku is talking about are free to visit the Worst Physics Forum Ever.
I have read many of your posts and have yet to find anything which remotely resembles science. You use scientific jargon to dress up empty arguments.