Why two mass attracts each other?

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by hansda, Mar 19, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ash64449 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    795
    Handsa, as i have already said, gravity is always attractive because acceleration is indistinguishable from gravity.
    As acceleration is indistinguisable,we can say that acceleration is same as gravitational field,or field that is attractive. Note that you cannot show acceleration to be repulsive and thats how it answers your question.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. ash64449 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    795
    no. Only when your 'real time' changes,is when time meaured by clocks changes.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424
     
  8. ash64449 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    795
    well,i think by 'real' time,he is talking about proper time. And indeed proper time dosen't change as it is the part of time-like invariant interval between two events.
     
  9. ash64449 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    795
    see my above reply.
     
  10. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,362
     
  11. eram Sciengineer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,877
    It's kinda amusing to watch hansda and ash argue

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. Guest254 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,056
    Well I think that settles it! Professionals (and I'm being presumptuous enough to speak for scientists in general) have a very different notion of what it means to understand a theory of physics than you do.

    In my mind, when you really understand something you don't really need to remember much! For instance, for my sins I have to give a GR class from time to time, and I would never recommend the students simply try to learn, verbatim, the lecture notes - I would simply ask that they understand them. Any student that managed to do that (say a mid 2:1 student) would certainly be able to reproduce a lot of basic GR (geodesic equation, variation if Einstein-Hilbert action, derive Schwarzchild solution, get physical conservations laws via Killing vectors....). I would also guess that they wouldn't proclaim their understanding of the subject is better than professional researchers!
     
  13. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    That's not true. Gravity can be repulsive when the 'pressure term' in the cosmological metric is dominant. Essentially that's how our universe began as an inflating soliton.
     
  14. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    What kind of a sin could that possibly be? Seems like it would be an honor expounding on such a theoretical model. I'm impressed.
     
  15. Guest254 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,056
    The "for my sins" comment probably needs a qualifier. I don't mind teaching in general (I actually quite like teaching some students), but for the most part I'd rather be working on my research.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    I figured as much. Tell me something about your field of research. So I can do some reading. Good luck in your future.
     
  17. Guest254 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,056
    My research is in mathematics (currently semi-Fredholm theory for nonlinear eigenvalue problems).
     
  18. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    I expect the reading won't do me much good. Still fun. Thanks Guest254.
     
  19. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424

    If "time measured by a clock" is "real time" and gravity/spacetime causes 'time dilation' for "real time"; that means 'time reversal' is possible.

    There is no evidence of 'time reversal'.

    So, "time measured by a clock" can not be "real time".
     
  20. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,362
    Is English a second language?
     
  21. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424
    You speak science. Where is the problem?
     
  22. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,362
    The problem is you're not speaking science.

    It's speculation and fiction.
     
  23. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424
    Well, what evidence you want? 'Experimental evidence that "time reversal" does not take place' - will it do for you?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page