World trade centre collapse, 9/11 conspiracy

More psychological BS by association.
Getting to the Moon was physics and engineering. Designing and building a skyscraper is physics and engineering. Coronavirus is biology and conspiracies are irrelevant.

But the laws of physics will never go away. Until the collapses are analyzed with accurate distribution of steel and concrete data it is unresolved. One thousand years won't matter.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Conspiracies are irrelevant?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You're in the conspiracy section my friend, made to accommodate all the cosnpiracy nuts that seek to promote their conspiracy nonsense.

Nup, it is resolved and it aligns with the laws of physics, despite your cries of anguish to the contrary.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The Laws of Physics do not change to support or prevent any conspiracy.

So some people don't want to do physics because they might find a conspiracy that they don't like. I don't give a shit. Physics is more important than America, Christianity, Islam, capitalism or socialism or any similar BS.

That is what I find so hilarious about this website. People here claiming to be so scientific. Even if I believed airliner impacts and fire could bring the towers down like that I would have expected multiple engineering schools to have had good physical and virtual models by 2005. That is why I keep pointing put that the University of Washington did the Tacoma Narrows bridge model in 4 months.

But a good model would require accurate steel and concrete distribution information. So it is also hilarious that the NCSTAR1 report does not have that data in 10,000 pages.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I think the Moon is made of green cheese. I task you, psikeyhackr, with proving otherwise. Until you prove to me I'm wrong this issue is not resolved.

 

Not for you. There is no amount of analysis, simulation or research that will convince you. Same with the flat earthers, the anti-vaxxers and the Clinton body count people.

So why don't _you_ want to do physics? Afraid to discover that your conspiracy is based on wishful thinking and political agendas?

Exactly. Which is why, in the end, your conspiracy theory will go nowhere.

 

I have no objection to your thinking that. In fact I consider it to be an excellent demonstration of your intellectual capacity.

 

Well, now you should understand how the rest of us have to the conclusion we have about yours.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Well done, You just hoisted yourself on your own pitard.

Don't forget to also acknowledge that you are a coward for not catering to my demand for proof of my idea.

Seriously though, it all seems rather awkward when you see it from the other side, doesn't it? Maybe think about that.

 

We can try to insult each other forever. I am not the one who is afraid to demand that certified "experts" create good models to explain what is seen in the videos.

Instead we get a 10,000 page report that admits that the top of the South Tower tilted 20 to 25 degrees but says nothing about the center of gravity of the tilted portion.

 

Actually, yes you are. Unless kavetching on a science forum counts as "demanding" in your books.

 

Nobody is "afraid" of anything about this, just bored.

It's like cold fusion or Seventh Day Adventism: a self-referential cottage industry, of interest only to its adherents.

 

Considering that you are reading what "bores" you and spending time responding to it I can only suggest that you see a psychiatrist.

I totally ignore what bores me, like baseball.

 

Yes, that's why you don't see me much in this part of the forum.

I'm only here now because you make a slight change from Fat Freddy. But I've learnt enough about you, so I'll be off.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

How many skyscrapers in history have successfully withstood impacts from fully-loaded jumbo jets?

 

Wait! I know this one!

Zero?

Kinda raises the question: why would anyone think a tower would survive an impact from a commercial jet?

 

You are the one demanding that certified "experts" create good models to explain what is seen in the videos. Yet you are too lazy/incompetent/scared to do what you demand other people do. Pretty much the definition of hypocrisy.

It doesn't say anything about what the guy on the 72nd floor had for lunch, either. CONSPIRACY!

 

Because they're built to withstand Cessna impacts, so put a couple of Cessna's together and that's a 767. If security could easily handle a gorilla on the loose, why wouldn't they be able to handle King Kong?

 

He already proved it with a stack of popsicle sticks a long time ago, which isn't all that far off from 1000+ feet of concrete and rebar.

 

The mass of a 767 is about 182x that of a Cessna.
The kinetic energy at 500mph is 12x that of 140mph.

So, that would require 2,190 Cessnas.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Exactly. Engineering and physics explained how we got to the Moon and how we built the WTC. Engineering and physics explained Apollo 13 and the WTC collapse. Even if conspiracy theory nuts refuse to believe that science and engineering.