I don't think you know what a forum flounce is do you!? You posted a flounce comment then returned. You denied flouncing. What has a a post showing you returning have to do with you flouncing? You are 20 years too late to the party. Not a scrap of evidence, just conspiracy guff. The biggest 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked | Sky HISTORY TV Channel 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked by Engineering Experts (greekreporter.com) 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunking | World Trade Center Myths (popularmechanics.com) You mean like your flaccid reply "I don't know" to a major claim? The building was burning everywhere, out of control, the fire crews reported this, the footage shows this. How the hell does demolition material survive that? Then we have the breathtakingly obvious - what was the actual point of bringing down the building when it was pretty much going to be a burnt out husk anyway - with almost 100% guaranteed need for it to be demolished anyway? Detailed answer please, preferably one that doesn't involve splattering paper all over Manhattan. Please don't embarrass yourself by talking about confidential documents needing destroying (the fire - duh) or some idiotic nonsense about insurance claims (building was burnt out anyway).