Would Descarte approve? (Immanuel Kant; Nietzche could?)

Discussion in 'General Philosophy' started by Kaiduorkhon, Aug 22, 2006.

  1. Kaiduorkhon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    552
    Providing a rare occasion of a non sequitur teaming up with an oxymoron to agree that the three body problem proves that two wrongs don't make a right, but that three or more do, might Descarte be moved to revise his cogito ergo sum to cogito ergo cogito sum? (Just asking? <The winning response gets writer's cramp?> And now this: if Latin really is post mortem, why is it exhumed in so many places for the same number of corroborately necromancing occasions?)
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Kaiduorkhon:

    Forgive me, but that is either the most incoherent thing I have ever read in my life, or I am completely missing your point here. Might you rephrase pretty much all of this?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Kaiduorkhon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    552
    Parabolic hyperbole?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Phlogiston?
     
  8. Kaiduorkhon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    552
    Dear invert nexus:

    You are easily one of the most spontaneous - benevolently stoked - bon fires on the forum, Sir.
    Semper Fi.

    "Twilight of the Idols.

    Skirmishes of an Untimely Man.

    48. Progress in my sense.

    "The doctrine of equality! There is no more poisonous poison anywhere: for it seems to be preached by justice itself, whereas it really is the termination of justice. "Equal to the equal, unequal to the unequal"--that would be the true slogan of justice; and also its corollary: "Never make equal what is unequal." "

    http://www.publicappeal.org/library...f_the_Idols.htm

    I believe that's the Kaufmann translation. "

    - invert nexus, in quick response to a difficult question
    (Leer es poder. Senor Maestro.)
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2006

Share This Page