Well, I didn't say soldiers were mindless puppets. Didn't try to imply that.
You'll find that much of the time, I am calm and rational.
You'll also find times when I'm defensive and irrational. They are unpleasant things to see and it gets me in trouble. Got me banned off the other place...
You're catching me at a rational moment but I do want to kinda bust my own bubble and give fair warning: I'm not always brainy and beware... I can be a defensive jerk sometimes. So not all my posts will be as this one is... I hate to think I'm painting an inaccurate image of myself here.
You make some good points there. The one major difference between that and ordinary jobs, however, are the consequences, mainly if indeed you got called up.
Sort of. But then again... manufacturing something to be used by anybody and physically being part of an occupying force in a war that may be unconstitutional are separate issues.
A great deal of the jobs in the military are this way too. Doing the job without Directly Confronting the Enemy or personally taking a life.
If you would like to explain what you think are some of those options, I would be interested.
Conscientious observer is one. Additionally, soldiers can be transferred for many different conflict of interest reasons to a different unit in order to keep them from performing duties that are in contradiction with a personal belief. I won't go in heavy detail because I really want to address the below bit and this will be a lengthy post.
For me, personally, I couldn't handle it. If I was asked (or required) to participate actively in the invasion and occupation of another country and knew that the rationale was flawed from the get-go, I couldn't go along with it and be proud of myself. I take my personal integrity pretty highly, and aside from being a chronic schedule breaker and someone who's often late, I do my best to practice what I preach (I guess I don't exactly preach about being on time, come to think of it... I'm in the clear!) and I would feel too wrong. I'd probably be forced to get discharged somehow.
Actually, I might be liable to go along at first, but have second thoughts down the road. Actually, I'm not really sure...:scratchin:
This is where my comment above really comes into play. In an irrational moment, I would likely light you up over what you said here.
Let's break this down a bit...
You (probably unintentionally) IMPLY that a person needs low personal integrity in order to actively assist the government in carrying out a policy which you find distasteful or disagreeable.
You IMPLY soldiers are proud of themselves for doing the wrong thing.
You assume way too much here. Especially after admitting you have never served and find the idea to be not your cup of tea.
That it's not your cup of tea is perfectly fine. There are a great many things that aren't my cup of tea. But part of your rational for why it's not your cup of tea seems misguided to me.
I got in trouble a lot in the Army. I had a bad habit of bucking authority and mouthing off. But I would have that same trouble later on down the road in civilian jobs.
It's a big part of why I'm now my own boss.
But I have no regrets for my service and I do not take kindly to insinuations, intentional or not, that my character is of Low Integrity. I did serve my time in the Army. I have done things that cause me to mourn to this day, things I will carry the rest of my life. Not out of malice, but out of necessity for the duty. I CHOSE to carry that burden and I refuse to make excuses for it or dump it off with a blame game on the government or the demanding military that "made me do it."
And I did enjoy a great deal of my peacetime service.
There were policies I disagreed with. That's INEVITABLE. There will ALWAYS be politics about foreign action that are questionable to anyone. But the world isn't going to stop turning to pander to one mans crisis of conscience. He must Suck It Up and either finish what he starts and fulfill his oath like a man-- Or find any way possible to convince his higher ups that a certain action is unconscionable.
There were times when I questioned an action and I went To Bat with my NCO's or BC's to plead my case. As with ANY debate, a consensus was reached in which each side made their reasons apparent- and sometimes, with the new information available- I learned I was grasping the wrong end of the stick.
Now, I admit that I had very good and tolerant leadership. Not everyone is so lucky. Cliques are also an inevitability and they will form even in a Uniformed Service.
Hollywood and Movies are notorious for displaying some of the more... interesting... perceptions of the Military. But Hollywood ain't exactly well known for accuracy.
I would ask that you think a wee bit more deeply before stating your opinion of another persons line of work. I have no problem whatsoever with a person not wanting to take part in military affairs. But someone treating soldiers as low character grunts pisses me off.
One guy even went so far as to say, "C'mon! You're American Indian! How could you serve in the Army that Subjugated you?!"
Gee... I dunno... Maybe it's because all the guys in THAT Army died over a hundred years ago? I deeply mourn what happened to my tribe and ancestors- but again- Those that DID that are DEAD.
BTW, what's the difference between something that would get you a dishonorable discharge and something that would get you court martialed?
Court Martial is essentially a trial- just as any other court. A soldier will be given court martial to try them for committing a crime. Sentence can include Dishonorable discharge OR time to be served in a Military Prison.
Discharge is just when leadership evaluates a soldier to be Unfit for service.
Discharge does not mean a person committed a crime.
Welcome to SciForums! Most of us are experts at derailing threads. It is a terminal condition...
Thanks, I'm glad to know I have a talent that may be useful here.