The necessary truth of mathematics (?)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there anything static in the world? Everything is a process.

Only in the most general way, or where the presuppositions of views like process philosophy or fringe "process physics" would be dominating interpretations of data.

Even the commonsense perspective about time called presentism actually entails a process outputting absurdly short-lived and quickly extinct states of the world. Though its proponents rarely (if ever) explore the most glaring consequences of what they believe.

Consciousness (as we experience it) wouldn't even be possible in presentism (now-ism), due to an interval of conscious experience (and cognition of it) being measured in milliseconds rather the attosecond to Planck time territory of subatomic changes.

If a constantly replaced global "now" is the only state of the universe that ever exists, then presentism is going to have to objectively accommodate the units for subatomic change, not the "gigantic" (in comparison) anthropocentric rate of a human's apprehension of change. Cognition is of such an extended duration (or chunk sequence of integrated neural modifications) that it could not temporally fit into the absurdly "thin" global Now that presentism demands (since again, it is the subatomic level that must be accommodated, not the "slow" configuration level of a brain).
_
 
Last edited:
I have given this person the benefit of the doubt for a bit, now that they have finally had the courtesy to post in the language of this forum. That may change. ;)
Well, actually, it's not a problem anymore. Almost everyone has built-in translators on their devices that translate automatically.
 
Dave, in Russian, "essence" is something that exists.
In English essence means "the nature or quality of something". The thing does not have to be physical, it can be conceptual. A poem's theme can have an essence.

Matter cannot exist without processes.
That may be true but it is a red herring.

Matter having processes does not mean that matter is a process.

A human has a spleen, but that does not mean a human is a spleen.
 
We are back MT?
It is unavoidable. Biology unfolds at that level, starting with abiogenesis, the process of nonliving matter acquiring biochemical complexity and ability to use energy for dynamical activities.
FUNDAMENTALS OF CELL BIOLOGY

The Stages Of Cell Signaling

---------------Quorum Sensing-----------------------------Self-referential communication---------------------Inter-cellular communication-------

1745345188606.png

---------------------------------Neural transmission---------------------------

1745347032526.png

At the most basic level, signaling happens in the following stages:
  1. A signal is sent. There are a number of ways this could happen. A cell could release a molecular cue, or the environmental conditions themselves could provide the molecule that is being detected. We’ll do a more in-depth exploration of signals and ligands shortly.
  2. This signal is received by the cell. This will require a receptor to recognize the signal and respond to it. Most often the receptor is at the cell surface, since that’s where signals would arrive first, but it doesn’t have to be. Nitric oxide (NO) is an example of a signaling molecule that can diffuse across cell membranes, so its receptor is in the interior of the cell.
  3. The signal is “interpreted” by the cell that receives it. This could involve a number of things, like splitting the signal so that multiple responses are possible; it also likely involves transferring the signal across the plasma membrane by activating specific internal responses. This interpretation step is called transduction.
  4. Finally, the cell responds to the signal. A cell could have multiple responses to a signal. Some responses are fast, while others are slow. If the signal is used to start a process, like cell division, apoptosis, or changes in cell identity, then there could be multiple changes in the cell as it prepares for the new behavior.
more.......

THE CELL CYCLE AND MITOSIS

1745343781034.png

 
exchemist said:
Cold. At absolute zero, to be precise
And now the question is: why doesn't matter gravitate at absolute zero?
And what logically follows to that is the question if in a dynamic universal manifold there is such a thing other than dynamical processes, i.e., Chaos?

Seems that the concept of stasis at any level, point, or temperature is pure mathematical theory, but cannot ever be achieved without destroying "superposition" and "quantum processes" at Planck scale.

Can a non-dynamical universe exist?
According to CDT (Causal Dnamical Triangulation) the universal spacetime fabric itself unfolds as a process, rather than exist as a state of being.
Causal dynamical triangulation (CDT), theorized by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, is an approach to quantum gravity that, like loop quantum gravity, is background independent.
This means that it does not assume any pre-existing arena (dimensional space) but, rather, attempts to show how the spacetime fabric itself evolves.
There is evidence [1] that, at large scales, CDT approximates the familiar 4-dimensional spacetime but shows spacetime to be 2-dimensional near the Planck scale, and reveals a fractal structure on slices of constant time. These interesting results agree with the findings of Lauscher and Reuter, who use an approach called Quantum Einstein Gravity, and with other recent theoretical work.
 
Last edited:
So you think that a body cooled to absolute zero will gravitate?
Gravitation is a function of mass, not temperature.

F = GMm/r², in which F is the force of gravity between 2 bodies with masses M and m, r is the distance between their centres of mass, and G is Newton's constant of gravitation.

Temperature does not appear in this expression.
 
Gravitation is a function of mass, not temperature.

F = GMm/r², in which F is the force of gravity between 2 bodies with masses M and m, r is the distance between their centres of mass, and G is Newton's constant of gravitation.

Temperature does not appear in this expression.
Temperature does not appear in this expression, but energy is appear. What will the mass be at zero energy?
 
It is unavoidable. Biology unfolds at that level, starting with abiogenesis, the process of nonliving matter acquiring biochemical complexity and ability to use energy for dynamical activities.

FUNDAMENTALS OF CELL BIOLOGY


The Stages Of Cell Signaling

---------------Quorum Sensing-----------------------------Self-referential communication---------------------Inter-cellular communication-------

View attachment 6696

---------------------------------Neural transmission---------------------------

View attachment 6698

At the most basic level, signaling happens in the following stages:
  1. A signal is sent. There are a number of ways this could happen. A cell could release a molecular cue, or the environmental conditions themselves could provide the molecule that is being detected. We’ll do a more in-depth exploration of signals and ligands shortly.
  2. This signal is received by the cell. This will require a receptor to recognize the signal and respond to it. Most often the receptor is at the cell surface, since that’s where signals would arrive first, but it doesn’t have to be. Nitric oxide (NO) is an example of a signaling molecule that can diffuse across cell membranes, so its receptor is in the interior of the cell.
  3. The signal is “interpreted” by the cell that receives it. This could involve a number of things, like splitting the signal so that multiple responses are possible; it also likely involves transferring the signal across the plasma membrane by activating specific internal responses. This interpretation step is called transduction.
  4. Finally, the cell responds to the signal. A cell could have multiple responses to a signal. Some responses are fast, while others are slow. If the signal is used to start a process, like cell division, apoptosis, or changes in cell identity, then there could be multiple changes in the cell as it prepares for the new behavior.
more.......

THE CELL CYCLE AND MITOSIS

View attachment 6693

and huge pastes again. This would have been useful for study in the 1980s why are you reminding me? I still have the text books.
 
Write4U:
No it does not.
Yes it does. (See how pointless it is, when you don't even try to justify your position?)
Natural selection is the most subtle of mathematical function.
Natural selection isn't a mathematical function. You ought to find out what a mathematical function is.
It is a passive pattern forming that depends on
Natural selection is not a pattern.
It doesnot need to know.
It doesn't need to know anything to do maths? How can it do maths without knowing any maths?
All it needs to react to the "been here" sign that was deposited the frst time the slime mold passed this dead end. It simply avoids this route because the slime molds recognizes its own sign and reacts to its message.
Where's the maths in that?
It doesn't need to understand it.
Exactly my point.
All it needs is "stimulation and"reaction", also known as "detection and a comparative" form of cognition"
from stored coded information (memory).
"Stimulation and reaction" is not also known as "detection and a comparative".

Stimulation and reaction is not cognition, either. Cognition is a mental process. Lifeforms that don't have brains don't have cognition.

All it needs is actionable detection of a fixed actionable quantity, such as quorum sensing.
No amount of buzz words will help clean up your mess.
But nobody says that detection needs to be a conscious act.
You do. You claim that when something detects something else, it is "doing maths". That's wrong.
All it needs is a specific reaction based on the physical type and mathematical value of the stimulant.
Stimulants aren't "mathematical values". Nor do they have mathematical values, unless we humans assign some to them.
But now you claim that it's not really a mathematical object, right?
What are you talking about?

Where exactly does physics begin?
It begins with a human being thinking about natural processes.
Note that quantum does not begin with a physical property such as muon.
A muon is not a physical property.

Also, you should learn to use the word "quantum" correctly. Remember when we explained it to you? No?
It begins with a probabilistic mathematical value and behavior before it can be even be identified physically.
No. Go back to basics. What is a quantum? What does that word mean, Write4U? Hint: it has nothing to do with probability or physics.
 
Is terminal speed causal to a rock falling? No, it is not causal to falling. It does control how fast the physical rock is allowed to fall, dependent on the environmental conditions.
No. Terminal speed doesn't control anything. Terminal speed is a measure of how fast an object is moving when it is no longer accelerating, as it falls through a fluid.
 
No. Go back to basics. What is a quantum? What does that word mean, Write4U? Hint: it has nothing to do with probability or physics.
Oh ugh.
In all this time, W4U still uses 'quantum' as a buzzword? He has learned nothing?
Even a chatbot can learn better than that.
 
Write4U:
p.s. note that the bacterial flagella uses a ion-driven microtubule motor.
Are you trying to get yourself banned again?

Lose the microtubules. We've done them.
@ Pinball1970,
Considering that you are a biologist, I am confident that when you examine the state of science in regard to microtubule functions, you will be enchanted by the evolutionary history and adaptability of tubulin structures for naturally selected purposes of electrochemical information transmission.
Stop evangelising, please. Nobody here is interested in your religion any more.
Where are all these cut and pastes from? All those numbers, like 1234. Are they footnotes in some article you've plagiarised? Or are you getting MS Copilot to write your posts for you, again?

p.p.s. James,
If you want to delete this, give it a few days so that people can comment on it. In principle I AM NOT WRONG!!!
The expanding science speaks for itself.
I won't be deleting this. I WILL be issuing you with further warnings if you keep this up.

Microtubules are dead. Let them rest in peace.

Look, you seem like a slow learner, so I'm going to spell this out for you explicitly: IF you continue to try to reopen the closed discussion of microtubules by posting about them in this or any other thread, you will receive an official warning for trying to override a moderator's decision. At the time of writing this, I see you have 60 active warning points. As a repeat offender, any warning you receive for this will come with 20 warning points. Result: two weeks away from the forum for you.

Clear?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top