The thread style is considered by several of us to be pretentious. The author seems more concerned about appearing erudite than about encouraging...
Some bacteria and archaea should have no difficulty. What makes you think they would perish? Or are you just trying to maintain your record of being...
No man. Get real. There was no encouragement there. Out of the blue, with no relationship to what had gone before, you suddenly said "I Read Books"....
And you really don't see that talking about yourself reading books, out of the blue, no contact to the foregoing, you don't see that such is an...
Here, in this thread. Why else talk about reading books? Why take multiple posts to (apparently) accept that your posts were unintelligble? Why...
So frigging what? Once again, totally irrelevant. I read books, I write books, I watch intelligent programs on TV, I watch dumb programs on TV, but...
For Pete's sake man. What a dumb question. There isn't a hint of meaning, of sense, of intent, of anything. It's just a jumble of words strung...
Now that is intelligible, but is only relevant to the thread if the objective of the thread is to declare, "Oh, look at me. I'm River. I'm really...
There is no apparent sense in what you said. Post #9 doesn't help in the slightest.
You can listen to your own convictions, or you can listen to external input. Readers decide the quality of writing, not the author.
Your responses are ambiguous, which casts serious doubts on your views.
My cat disagrees with you.
That may make sense to you. It sounds like a troubled digestive system to me.
I get it. You spoke imprecisely. That was my point. It's a habit with you. It's one reason your views are rarely treated with respect.
One of my favourites, for entertainment value, was The Man Who Would Be King, with his good friend Michael Caine. It was directed by John Huston, who...
That's not what you said. You clearly stated that "all 85,000 polling stations have their own rules", when the fact is that each state sets the rules...
Please provide evidence that all 85,000 polling stations have their own rules. Alternatively retract that ridiculous absolute statement and look less...
If it were efficacious then that would easily realised. Since its efficacy is not apparent it is, ipso facto, non-efficacious. I didn't say it did....
This thread exists, but it delivers nothing of value, effectiveness or efficacy. Perhaps if you were not so close to the problem the explanation...
Jumping to a concussion.
Separate names with a comma.