11000 scientists warn re climate change

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELivfFDUcAAYIT9?format=jpg&name=small
ELivfFDUcAAYIT9


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50779461

The worms bury themselves deep beneath the sand, but recent storms have uprooted them and Drakes Beach, about 50 miles north of San Francisco, has been covered in the creatures.
Click to expand...

looking at the volume and the rough species distribution(suggestion), this is a significant number
possibly equal to many hundreds of kilometers of coast line
my guess is each worm represents around 1/2 to 1 cubic meter of sand
 
Last edited:
Benson said:
Man made climate change, the biggest deception in the history of mankind.
Click to expand...
See, the reason that climate change deniers like yourself will fail miserably is that your lies are now trivial to disprove - people just have to look out their window.

I was talking to Scott Peters the other day and he said that even republican congresspeople from Florida are now quietly coming to him saying "what sort of climate legislation can I sign on to?" This isn't because they suddenly understand the science (they don't) but because the people in Miami and Key West are seeing their streets disappear underwater. They are demanding action on climate change because they can see it. And if you tell them "you are imagining things - sea level isn't rising and storms aren't getting stronger!" they will laugh in your face - and then vote for the guy who is going to take action on climate change.
 
If you have ever read the statisticians analysis of the Australian raw data and the modified Acorn 1 and 2 data sets you will see why the Statisticians reckon that scientists should never be allowed to modify their raw data sets and it should only be done by professionals like statisticians.

After all, up to 10 degrees centigrade differences between the modified Acorn 1 and 2 data has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
 
LaurieAG said:
If you have ever read the statisticians analysis of the Australian raw data and the modified Acorn 1 and 2 data sets you will see why the Statisticians reckon that scientists should never be allowed to modify their raw data sets and it should only be done by professionals like statisticians.

After all, up to 10 degrees centigrade differences between the modified Acorn 1 and 2 data has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
Click to expand...
Could you link 'the statisticians analysis'?
 
LaurieAG said:
If you have ever read the statisticians analysis of the Australian raw data and the modified Acorn 1 and 2 data sets you will see why the Statisticians reckon that scientists should never be allowed to modify their raw data sets and it should only be done by professionals like statisticians.
Click to expand...
Really? If a scientist runs a calibration on their sensor, and they realize it is off by 10 counts (and has been for the last 200 measurements) they shouldn't update their data? They should keep the old, incorrect data in their analyses? Interesting position.
 
billvon said:
See, the reason that climate change deniers like yourself will fail miserably is that your lies are now trivial to disprove - people just have to look out their window.

I was talking to Scott Peters the other day and he said that even republican congresspeople from Florida are now quietly coming to him saying "what sort of climate legislation can I sign on to?" This isn't because they suddenly understand the science (they don't) but because the people in Miami and Key West are seeing their streets disappear underwater. They are demanding action on climate change because they can see it. And if you tell them "you are imagining things - sea level isn't rising and storms aren't getting stronger!" they will laugh in your face - and then vote for the guy who is going to take action on climate change.
Click to expand...

You're the alarmist, the conspiracy pusher. It's up to you to convince others but your, "Appeal to authority" fallacy doesn't cut it.
 
billvon said:
See, the reason that climate change deniers like yourself will fail miserably is that your lies are now trivial to disprove - people just have to look out their window.

I was talking to Scott Peters the other day and he said that even republican congresspeople from Florida are now quietly coming to him saying "what sort of climate legislation can I sign on to?" This isn't because they suddenly understand the science (they don't) but because the people in Miami and Key West are seeing their streets disappear underwater. They are demanding action on climate change because they can see it. And if you tell them "you are imagining things - sea level isn't rising and storms aren't getting stronger!" they will laugh in your face - and then vote for the guy who is going to take action on climate change.
Click to expand...


Do these people demand something of
King Canute
also known as Cnut
that is unlikely to actually happen?
..................................................
vote for me and I will stop the seas from rising
or
better yet
I'll teach you how to walk on water
 
I'd like to take a selfie in Australia with a bush fire in the background.

"I deny it!"

:tongue:
 
sculptor said:
Do these people demand something of
King Canute
also known as Cnut
that is unlikely to actually happen?
Click to expand...
They are demanding action on climate change. That will happen to a greater or lesser degree - but since it is already happening, it's not a foolish request.
 
Benson said:
You're the alarmist, the conspiracy pusher. It's up to you to convince others but your, "Appeal to authority" fallacy doesn't cut it.
Click to expand...
Not any more. Try telling a guy in Australia watching his house burn that there's no such thing as climate change. Try telling a guy who is going to lose his home in Miami to rising seas that he's imagining things. They will laugh in your face and then kick your denier butt to the curb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top