Why?If not 2, then it may take the form of something like this: There is a finite set of natural numbers that are used in describing truths in mathematics (including "logic") and those are the only natural numbers in existence.
*hides from Godel*
No matter where I look for definitions in mathematics, the fundamental idea stems from a duality, or a twoness. examples would include inverse, anything that is an operation, transformation, or action, in topology for any space there is a mirror space, all circular things can be defined by being contrast with hyperbolic things, etc. even the definition of infinity relies upon its duality with zero, and the definition of zero relies upon its duality with infinity.
I disagree. They may have a certain definition, or postulates and rules (see Peano's axioms) made by us but you still need to comply with those rules. If you want to define "number" somehow differently, then my definition of "number" did not refer to it.Except that numbers are not natural. They are man made so we could have made them any way.
previously I thought 0 took this spot, but I realized in fact it was 2.
How many fingers?
I disagree. They may have a certain definition, or postulates and rules (see Peano's axioms) made by us but you still need to comply with those rules. If you want to define "number" somehow differently, then my definition of "number" did not refer to it.
I disagree. They may have a certain definition, or postulates and rules (see Peano's axioms) made by us but you still need to comply with those rules. If you want to define "number" somehow differently, then my definition of "number" did not refer to it.
I probably should have used this pic instead:
since it was most likely the source of this hypothesis.
"3" which is defined by recursion of the dual reversible operation of addition which from which you can define a measure or "Counting" of its recursion.
the definition still runs from 2
Are you going to give me a real criticism of my idea with detailed examples, or just post unintelligent jokes?I probably should have used this pic instead:
since it was most likely the source of this hypothesis.