OK VoidSet, let me test my understanding. When you say the number two is the only number, you are not saying there is no one and there is no three. You are saying that for any event, there is an alternative event. Further, you are saying that given one view of reality there is always another view. You are saying that no matter what we bring up it will be one to two because you can always apply a negative where a positive has been given, and you can always apply a positive where a negative has been given, and so there are always two, the one given as the positive or the negative, and the other one which fills out the set of two.Are you going to give me a real criticism of my idea with detailed examples, or just post unintelligent jokes?
Either the poster is a troll or spectacularly uninformed. Either way there is absolutely no way to get a valid discussion from someone posting the above in a non-joking manner.No matter where I look for definitions in mathematics, the fundamental idea stems from a duality, or a twoness. examples would include inverse, anything that is an operation, transformation, or action, in topology for any space there is a mirror space, all circular things can be defined by being contrast with hyperbolic things, etc. even the definition of infinity relies upon its duality with zero, and the definition of zero relies upon its duality with infinity.
If not 2, then it may take the form of something like this: There is a finite set of natural numbers that are used in describing truths in mathematics (including "logic") and those are the only natural numbers in existence.
*hides from Godel*
No matter where I look for definitions in mathematics, the fundamental idea stems from a duality, or a twoness. examples would include inverse, anything that is an operation, transformation, or action, in topology for any space there is a mirror space, all circular things can be defined by being contrast with hyperbolic things, etc. even the definition of infinity relies upon its duality with zero, and the definition of zero relies upon its duality with infinity.
Either the poster is a troll or spectacularly uninformed. Either way there is absolutely no way to get a valid discussion from someone posting the above in a non-joking manner.