the last i heard these two molecules cannot reproduce themselves, therefor cannot be termed 'life'.There's some.
The creation of amino acids and polymers from elements has been done in the lab and observed in nature.
the last i heard these two molecules cannot reproduce themselves, therefor cannot be termed 'life'.There's some.
The creation of amino acids and polymers from elements has been done in the lab and observed in nature.
the last i heard these two molecules cannot reproduce themselves, therefor cannot be termed 'life'.
Isn't this the "God of gaps" argument? Where any gap in scientific explanation is room for God as an alternative explanation?
call it what you will but it's still valid.Isn't this the "God of gaps" argument? Where any gap in scientific explanation is room for God as an alternative explanation?
computers can reduce years to minutes.Not yet, but then, life had something like 2 billion years to happen?
Wait and see, wait and see
You're going to get caned for the grammatical error in that title, you do know that? That probably encapsulates the worthyness of your link/spam aswell.
Much as I consider Imaplank to be a total prat with very little of a meaningful education I think you have misjudged him here. He is not saying he thinks the typographical error is dreadful, he is suggesting the CGB (Correct Grammar Brigade) will pounce upon it.Let me get this straight. We have a critic saying that a grammatical error destroyes the worthYness of etc. and etc.
What about the accurate spelling of worthIness?
Let me get this straight. We have a critic saying that a grammatical error destroyes the worthYness of etc. and etc.
What about the accurate spelling of worthIness?
How many points for akurit spalin?
Much as I consider Imaplank to be a total prat with very little of a meaningful education I think you have misjudged him here. He is not saying he thinks the typographical error is dreadful, he is suggesting the CGB (Correct Grammar Brigade) will pounce upon it.
The two premises, the big bang and spontaneous life, are as hard to believe as any crazy theory. If you are highly educated in any field, science for example, you would be able to present data to prove any theory and stand it up like a house of cards. I think it is great that scientists are exploring god's works, but to worship his handiwork is not what he had intended.
I think it is philosophically confusing to teach scientific theory as fact to children, when we don't really know. Anyone who watched that video must have cringed when they interviewed the students who supported evolution. I thought the quotes from the bible were quite good.
in the video it's states that there is variety built into the genetic code of all species,
Let's keep God out of science.
in the video it's states that there is variety built into the genetic code of all species, and that some varieties are better suited for different enviorments. If suddenly all people over 6' were getting systematically beheaded, eventually most everyone alive and being born would be below six feet. The species has not "evolved", just a dominant trait has succeeded. Or at least that is how I understand the video's assertion.
From what I undertsand of evolution, they use this basic premise to explain how lightning and chemicals became humans. dominant traits and mutations creating higher and higher order.