Atheists and the soul

Do you sign?

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • No.

    Votes: 10 66.7%

  • Total voters
    15
Status
Not open for further replies.
To me, a truly selfless person is someone who will do something for another without EXPECTING something in return aside from perhaps gratitude or the desire to see that person "pass it on".

How about the Bible Jesus... do you see him as bein truly selfless.???
 
altruism is something I would wager 95% of humanity is incapable of understanding or performing

I disagree.
Unless your definition of altruism is so narrow as to preclude simple things like offering a thirsty person a drink of water.
Does one gain any advantage by holding a door for a stranger?

Damned near every single time I have screwed up royally, total strangers have offered me their help.
You may just be underestimating the communal spirit and/or good will of the entire species.
 
To me, a truly selfless person is someone who will do something for another without EXPECTING something in return aside from perhaps gratitude or the desire to see that person "pass it on". A small example of it; I make a point of stopping to check on people I see out walking that don't appear to be walking for the sake of walking (obviously someone out in sweatpants with an mp3 player and sweatband jogging is most likely there for the sake of jogging) and ask if they need or could use a ride somewhere.

That is not my idea of selfless. That is my idea of simply being a good citizen. I am constantly (but often subtlely) checking out if people need help (much to my wife's consternation). I don't consider myself selfless.

For me, selflessness goes beyond looking out for others, to sacrificing for others.
Offering a thirsty man a drink, when I have plenty of water for myself, is simply kind.
Offering a thirsty man a drink, when I only have enough for myself - that is selfless.

How about the Bible Jesus... do you see him as bein truly selfless.???
He is simply at the far end of the bell curve.


Point of order:
For those using it, I'd like to have someone define this term "truly selfless". I don;t understand it. Specifically, what does "truly selfless" mean that "selfless" does not?
 
I disagree.

Damned near every single time I have screwed up royally, total strangers have offered me their help.
You may just be underestimating the communal spirit and/or good will of the entire species.

[Mayb im a Crystal Child.???]

An employee was alowed to drive a company vehicle to an from work... but on a non work day... wit-out permission they drove the car... an totaled it.!!!
They lost ther privilage to drive anuther company vehicle but they was not fired... hollared at or even lectured;;; is that bein altruistic.???
 
[Mayb im a Crystal Child.???]

An employee was alowed to drive a company vehicle to an from work... but on a non work day... wit-out permission they drove the car... an totaled it.!!!
They lost ther privilage to drive anuther company vehicle but they was not fired... hollared at or even lectured;;; is that bein altruistic.???
No.

Who, in that scenario, are you suggesting might be altruistic?
 
Woud the way you feel be any diferent whether you shared the water... or not shared the water.???
Of course.

of course
I was programmed by my mother to be helpful, kind, polite, responsible, forgiving, etc...
Deviation from programming is invariably unpleasant.

Not sure if you're talking tongue-in-cheek.

Do you take any credit yourself for knowing good from bad? Or does all the credit go to your mom?
 
Of course.

Not sure if you're talking tongue-in-cheek.

Do you take any credit yourself for knowing good from bad? Or does all the credit go to your mom?

Yes I take credit and responsibility for all of my actions, and the mindset that led to them.
The trick is in understanding your own programming.
..
anecdote:
I was having a bit of a rough go of it while in the army. I had a difficult time when forced to tolerate stupidity and ritual.
(When the Tao is lost, there is goodness. When goodness is lost, there is morality. When morality is lost, there is ritual.)
One fine day, I was wandering o'er the commons when a major called out to me. Not wishing to engage in conversation, I ignored him.
Shortly thereafter, he was standing in front of me demanding that I salute him(ritual).
I began to do that, then paused...for a moment of enlightenment... I then began to follow the programming while voicing the actions aloud.
cub scouts salute with 2 fingers(and did so)
boy scouts salute with 3 fingers(etc)
Explorers with 4
and the army with all five
Loudly: "OH MY GOD, I'VE BEEN PROGRAMMED"!
Dumbfounded, the poor fool spun on his heel and walked away.
I watched him depart for a moment while storing the memory, then went back to my own thoughts.

When you know your own programming and then choose to follow it or deviate...that is taking personal responsibility.
And I would have it no other way.
 
My post was direcred to Sculptor based on his post (link below) so i await his response befor replyin to you:::
I got that.

Except that it seems to be a non sequitur from his post. You're simply putting forth a scenario and asking if it demonstrates altruism. There seems to be no tie-in to Sculptor's post. Which is fine. And which is why I had no problem taking your post at face-value.

So, what does someone crashing a car and not getting punished have to do with altruism?

I'm guessing sculptor is likely to ask a very similar question, I'm just beating him to it.
 
Woud you'r choice of whether to share the water or not... depend on which action resulted in the bigger personal payoff.???

If I were acting selflessly, the personal payoff would not be relevant.
If I were a normal, middle-of-the-road person, I would weigh the odds. I might still decide to offer him the water, but I'd check my needs first.

And again. Sharing water is not selfless. Offering water when I only have enough for one is selfless.

How did we get on this topic??

This thread is about the atheistic conviction of the non-existence of a soul.

May I suggest you start your own thread.
 
You're simply putting forth a scenario and asking if it demonstrates altruism. There seems to be no tie-in to Sculptor's post.

I'm guessing sculptor is likely to ask a very similar question, I'm just beating him to it.


Sculptor used the word altruism... an suggests that people have offered ther help when he has screwed up royally;;; im puttin forth a similar scenario an i await his reply insted of just guessin what it might be.!!!
 
Woud you'r choice of whether to share the water or not... depend on which action resulted in the bigger personal payoff.???

If I were acting selflessly, the personal payoff would not be relevant.

I cant emagine an example of "acting selflessly"... well... unless some sort of "magic" is involved.!!!

If I were a normal, middle-of-the-road person, I would weigh the odds. I might still decide to offer him the water, but I'd check my needs first.

Of course... an do you have an example of an abnormal person who woud not weigh the odds.???

May I suggest you start your own thread.

No need... it was a bit of a quibble but you answrd :)

So whare are we at concernin the specific thred topic.???

O... one thang you didnt answr yet is what you have learned about me from my replys to you'r hypothetical thred topic.!!!

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...and-the-soul&p=3226535&viewfull=1#post3226535
 
Last edited:
[Mayb im a Crystal Child.???]

An employee was alowed to drive a company vehicle to an from work... but on a non work day... wit-out permission they drove the car... an totaled it.!!!
They lost ther privilage to drive anuther company vehicle but they was not fired... hollared at or even lectured;;; is that bein altruistic.???

If this was what you were waiting for a reply to:

There ain't enough information to determine altruism.

..............
think about this:
The best altruism is mutually profitable.
..............
Selflessness is an impossibility for any sentient being. All is experienced through the self.
Could you say that a suicide bomber is being selfless?
How about someone diving on a grenade?

which ties into
Maybe. What if our soul is belief?
from post #94

interesting
Does belief require self reflected knowledge? Or the opposite(ignorance)?
 
If this was what you were waiting for a reply to:

There ain't enough information to determine altruism.

Yes much was left out.!!!
The person was a good worker (hard to come by) so we let the issue slide... plus we did have empathy for them.!!!

..............
think about this:
The best altruism is mutually profitable.
..............
Thats as good as its gonna get... an its grate for society.!!!

Selflessness is an impossibility for any sentient being.

I agree... an Dave dont want to continue discussin this side issue anymore... so back to the specific thred topic.!!!
 
DaveC426913 said:
No one said you have to be greedy. As has been pointed out, you could do a lot of good with that money.

"In a nutshell, it says he will give you riches beyond your wildest dreams of avarice."

avarice: extreme greed for wealth or material gain.

DaveC426913 said:
I offer you a contract that says I will give you a piece of gum in exchange for all the coin in your pocket, when I have - just moments before - watched you turn out your pockets, empty. Are you suggesting you would be unable to agree to that contract? The contract does not require there be any coin in your pocket - simply that, if there were, I would be entitled to it.

You’re an atheist. You know that you don’t have soul. You’d be taking advantage of your friend’s stupidity for personal gain.

DaveC426913 said:
By the way, did you vote?

Yes.

Good day to you, Dave.
 
You’re an atheist. You know that you don’t have soul. You’d be taking advantage of your friend’s stupidity for personal gain.
You evaded the question.

Is the contract deeming me the benefactor of any coinage in your pocket valid? The contract does not specify that there need be any coinage in your pocket, let alone transferred.

Likewise, contracts are not voided simply by "taking advantage" of someone as you call it. He has made this offer, well aware of your views.

I might add, that just because you are sure there is no soul, that does not mean, bindingly, that there isn't. His side of the contract doesn't have to grant that your opinion on the matter is a valid one.

And that's the crux. Just because you are sure there is no soul does not mean there is no soul. No atheist can assert that. So, while you claim he is 'stupid', you cannot, for the purposes of a contract, claim 'you have more knowledge, and therefore are unable to sign the contract because it is not valid'.


By the way, did you vote?
Yes.
Right. You voted no. You would be an N(a). (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...and-the-soul&p=3226358&viewfull=1#post3226358).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top