Society hasn't been informed on the most beneficial way to avert the climate apocalypse. Indisputably, the future of mankind has already been decided by the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry. And the presstitutes that head all the major environmental agencies have decided in favor of continuing subsidies for themselves and their masters.
So prove me wrong. Prove the performance of your job is not dependent on electricity, or modern technology, or use of the internet, or any of the other things these "polluting thieves" provide.
The documentary is not speaking here. You are. If you think there are things we should know, feel free to post them here. That's how forums work. It is poor form to simply post a 90 minue message and presume it will speak in your place. What you want is a blog.
I don't mean metaphorical religion; I mean you literally keep referring to angels and demons.
Murdering half of all humans on earth is extraordinarily evil. Saving the planet by ceasing to subsidize the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry is perfectly just and reasonable.
I did not suggest murdering anyone.
Those I referred to as thieves are the industrialists that have seized control of government for the purpose of having their sociopathic corporations subsidized on the backs of the taxpaying poor and middle class. And I didn't mean to exclude the shadow government. Furthermore, I don't owe any of them anything.
Get educated. Watch the two videos. And understand that I'm not like the hypocritical climate alarmists. I'm totally vegan and advocate a realistic way to save the planet.
Is that what you live for the most? You remind me of Wimpy on the old Popeye cartoons. "I'd gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today."
Then a clear and straightforward decision could be made by everyone involved, as in a truly democratic society. Shall we cease to subsidize the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry or should the majority confess to being completely helplessness dupes of corporate control and simply await the climate apocalypse? That way, at least, the climate alarmists could cease being so incredibly dishonest.
That is good.
What do you think should happen with car racing, boat racing etc
No. I have a 1200 cc car and if I purchased a sports car I would do so because it would use less fuel (less wind resistance) the way I drive. I have one in mind but it is 1600 cc which is bigger than I would like.
You should forget about all that and be waiting and watching for the end of the world. Personally, I'm happily expecting a Trumpocalypse.
When back in the bush I won't care.
And, political reasons notwithstanding, people like meat.
Yes. This also accounts for why so many people get defensive when the moral implications of killing sentient animals for food are put to them, let along the environmental implications. People have a great capacity for cognitive dissonance.
I won't ask a vegan. You are being something of an extremist.
I am in favor of small governments of limited power who are wise and who obey the rule of law.
Justice demands no such thing. People demand such things as agricultural subsidies. Since we live in a democracy, that demand is expressed by the government. (I agree it is a problem.)
No, I'm not. Ayn Rand has a childishly simplistic view of political systems, and the examples in her books would never work in the real world.
Posting on the Internet is not required for life. It only serves to stroke your ego - and the computer required to do so (and the power required to operate it) consumes irreplaceable, non-renewable resources.
Why is it that you seem to know nothing about this world? Are you from another planet or are you a paid propagandist and shill for the State Department?