Is the UN veto democratic? Or is it a continuation of colonial right to decide what the settler states should be allowed to do?
Is the UN veto democratic?
Or is it a continuation of colonial right to decide what the settler states should be allowed to do?
It's certainly not Democratic in that the nations with veto power are arbitrary, they happen to have been the most powerful ones.
Yes. So... What? Would you prefer a different system?
Is the UN veto democratic? Or is it a continuation of colonial right to decide what the settler states should be allowed to do?
Is the UN veto democratic? Or is it a continuation of colonial right to decide what the settler states should be allowed to do?
Is the UN veto democratic? Or is it a continuation of colonial right to decide what the settler states should be allowed to do?
I think we should have a revolving security council that has members representative of different regional coalitions. Then the veto would make more sense.
no joe there isnt, the rotating seats on the SC DO NOT carry the right of veto, if they did maybe the whole thing would work. The only nations who can veto something are the US, England, China, Russia, France. Out of interest anyone guess where else these 5 names apear?