Now go buzz off river, I'm not getting into one of your trolling exercises.
Then Buzz Off pad .
Mathematics is a consequence of the Real Physical Objects . Do you understand pad ?
Now go buzz off river, I'm not getting into one of your trolling exercises.
Question is river, do you understand?Then Buzz Off pad .
Mathematics is a consequence of the Real Physical Objects . Do you understand pad ?
Question is river, do you understand?
Actually I have like most, the run of any section in the forum...which you don'tThen Buzz Off pad .
Philosophical, pretentious claptrap, which I doubt you understand yourself.Mathematics is a consequence of the Real Physical Objects . Do you understand pad ?
Zero, that's the point. Zero is an abstract relational value (the absence of a value).0 is not a natural number . What exists in 0 ? What physically exists in 0 ?
Zero, that's the point. Zero is a relational value (the absence of a value).
Here is a simpler descriptionZero, that's the point. Zero is an abstract relational value (the absence of a value).
Here is a simpler description
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/0_(number)
0 (zero) is both a number and a numerical digit used to represent that number in numerals. As a number, zero means nothing—an absence of other values. It plays a central role in mathematics as the identity element of the integers, real numbers, and many other algebraic structures. As a digit, zero is used as a placeholder in place value systems. Historically, it was the last digit to come into use. In the English language, zero may also be called nil when a number, o/oh when a numeral, and nought/naught in either context.
So? What has that to do with your claim it isn't a number? You were wrong again...face reality.Zero was originally an accounting symbol , in Ancient Babylon .
river said: ↑
Zero was originally an accounting symbol , in Ancient Babylon .
So? What has that to do with your claim it isn't a number? You were wrong again...face reality.
Again so what??Zero has no substance . And/or is the absence of substance .
In the Physical , zero is the latter , but not the elimination of substance . To my first statement , To the physical , Zero is not possible.
river said: ↑
Zero has no substance . And/or is the absence of substance .
In the Physical , zero is the latter , but not the elimination of substance . To my first statement , To the physical , Zero is not possible.
Again so what??
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/0_(number)
0 (zero) is both a number and a numerical digit used to represent that number in numerals.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Now go run along river, go along shoo! [or if you like buzz off] I'm not playing with you today, or your trollish childish games.
Logic, no physical stuff is required for zero to be true. It is an axiom.What is the number based on ?
https://www.britannica.com/science/Peano-axiomsIn particular, the Peano axioms enable an infinite set to be generated by a finite set of symbols and rules. The five Peano axioms are: Zero is a natural number. Every natural number has a successor in the natural numbers.
Again so what??
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/0_(number)
0 (zero) is both a number and a numerical digit used to represent that number in numerals.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Now go run along river, go along shoo! [or if you like buzz off] I'm not playing with you today, or your trollish childish games.
Didn't read all of the reference but didn't see what I picked up from QI English comedy panel show
They quoted not only was 0 a number, it was a EVEN number, as it lay between -1 and 1
0 is not a natural number
What is the number based on ?
I must come back and offer my sincere congratulations river. I always thought there was no hope for you and learning, but at last you have finally picked up some knowledge. Good boy!!!
Anything else is incidental of course.
The forum and myself will be the best judge of that. But I do give you a point on todays effort....that brings it to 1.oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo1% in total!!Its been going on for years pad .
The forum and myself will be the best judge of that. But I do give you a point on todays effort....that brings it to 1.oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo1% in total!!
Not in the sciences you won't!And I will judge the forum and you pad .