Electrodynamic Spin Gravity

The two forces that apply to matter are inertia and gravity
exerted by the force of the graviton. This particle is out of phase with space as a super warp particle, the same form that allows the photon to have momentum, the two formulas on my last post
demonstrate the exchange rate of these forces as one entity in
resonance, creating a pull me push me type of effect of a
quasi-singularity function in radial torsion so that any particle can have the potential of being dark, luminal or neutral matter forms
of temporal flux of the vacuum.

This allows inertia and gravity to exert a medium for potential
as space, time is a reaction as a warp in multiple torsion in reference to set {x,y,z,t} onto subset {i,j,k,l} which is a
dimensional field effect of set {x_i,y_j,_z_k,t_l}r^4_vac as the space-time continuum. This is only four magnitudes of multi-torsion field effect, which declares mc^4 distorts space as three
magnitues of gravity, the same would hold true for inertia. The first one all ready exists as conventional space. Multi-torsion of
super virtual particles of the vacuum by variable frequency laser
emissions at a super cooled vacuum core should produce zpe
generation of the said vacuum mass in negative g's of density
per cm^3, depending on the conductive material used say multiple
lightning strikes on a Titanium vacuum structure.

This event coincides with space and time being in the same place
regarding inertia and gravity waves in a vacuum having the same
effect as a singularity, neutron stars and pulsars relates to the
information in the first paragraph of this post.

See www.fixall.org: On Zero Point Energy read all of it!
 
Last edited:
Thanks Kirk Gaulden :)

Yes I believe that there is an ether, the absolute fabric of the Universe. However remember matter is made up of two components, magnetic neutrons, and electric electrons and it's induced mate, the proton.

As ESGT points out, the B-E field (magnetic/electric) of geomagnetic mass is layed out in space. The ZPE is an attempt to quantify space, I would rather leave the conjecture beyond ESGT to the speculators, I am sure there is much to uncover, BUT a paradigm shift is certainly taking place.

:)
 
Man, you guys are both nuts. Have you listened to yourselves lately? You sound like a bad sci-fi movie; nothing but a bunch of made up techobabble made to SOUND smart but has been proven wrong so many times it's just sad to read now. So have fun with your lives and remember! NO ONE TAKES YOU SERIOUSLY!
 
Seems James R has packed his bags and left without completing the math challenge, funny how there seems to be a waft of troll in the air.

:)
 
"Seems James R has packed his bags and left without completing the math challenge, funny how there seems to be a waft of troll in the air."

Well, I agree with James if he did. There is nothing more tiresome and boresome than debunking incoherent technobabble, when the people proclaiming it are not open to what real science has to say about it.
 
technobabel?

I take it, you did not check out my sight, your ignorance is compellingly faulted the science of over unity is the realm of today.

We're coming up with reasons things work in the universe. I haven"t heard anything from from quantum theory buffs on this subject!

And nothing counter my claim from your mouth either!
 
Re: technobabel?

Originally posted by Kirk Gaulden
I take it, you did not check out my sight, your ignorance is compellingly faulted the science of over unity is the realm of today.

We're coming up with reasons things work in the universe. I haven"t heard anything from from quantum theory buffs on this subject!

And nothing counter my claim from your mouth either!

Yeah I went you your site: a lot of sentences strung together, nothing at all convincing. And, by the way, quantum mechanics does a damn good job of explaining how things work in the universe. If not, you wouldn't be typing this right now, lasers wouldn't exist, forget about MRI's and don't forget nuclear energy. Sure it may not be perfect, but no theory is. And the only thing I've seen worth considering replacing QM is string theory.
 
What I am writing deals with string theory

The information expressed in my previous posts are of K-theory
and M-theory.

{x_i,y_j,z_k,t_l}r_me^4*pi represents torsion in two axis spin form that produces graviton field flux of an electron generated by
zpe.
 
Thanks Kirk G, string theory I presume ?

How is that different, in explaining gravity, to the other two contenders, Newton and GR (not that GR explains gravity, but..)

Is there a link that you like, that is simple and straightforward. I have looked into it, but made no progress, so maybe if you have time you could present your case.

:)

James R, I wouldn't bother posting here, unless you wish to be part of the discussion. Sorry you bore me.
 
"James R, I wouldn't bother posting here, unless you wish to be part of the discussion. Sorry you bore me.".

Or: how to make one of the few people qualified to talk about the stuff in this thread go "oh f*ck off you pathetic bastards".

Well done.
 
Look up Space-time on your search I did this over a period of 16
years of research your turn.

You can't transfer sites from one computer to the other with this
system that your using.
 
Crisp:

Zarkov and I have a history on another forum. He doesn't take kindly to having his errors pointed out.

I'll stop wasting my time on this thread, I think, though I may occasionally pop in to taunt and laugh at Zarkov a little.
 
Originally posted by James R
Crisp:

Zarkov and I have a history on another forum. He doesn't take kindly to having his errors pointed out.

So YOU are responsible for bringing all those crackpots to sciforums.com ? :p

Just kidding, cheers all,

Crisp
 
>> then 10 pages of elementary calculations where you replaced "r v^2" the standard Newtonian calculations by what you call Gcentral spin.

True Crisp, but if you look deeper tGcentral spin is derived from the motion of the satellites and note from the motion of the centre of spin... thus the structure of the Universe is uncovered.


>> What you have done is taken classical mechanics and thrown in a "new" variable.

This new variable ensures all the "simple maths as you call it" is kept simple, actually the way the Universe works, IMO.

I realise James R is so biased that he has as expected censured me, but a little more than a cursory look could be beneficial, if gravity is your interest.


As far as the arm waving words are concerned, that is entirely open to refinement, and any suggestion here would be taken kindly.

There are equations in those papers that have never been seen before, and the subtle fine nature of our Solar System is thus uncovered.

:)
 
Monopole radial acceleration

Monopoles theoretically can bond to create virtual particles that
effect quarks to function as a type of meson accelerating 3D at
the -vt*dr^4:{x,y,z,t}/+g_vac creating a tunneling/manifold effect on matter up:90', side ways:180', and bottom spin:270' and side ways:360'. This is Newton Mechanics of motion in a particle in one dimension string plancks, but in the equation r^4
represent 4D in motion this is simplified...
 
Back
Top