Schleeb is citing authority, by the rules of England.
I was trying to make the point to him that England's rules don't say that all other varieties of English are irrefutably, universally false, nor, to my knowledge, has anyone said so who had some tangible authority over the language. I understand the rules for their English basically as, "This is what
we understand to be right for
us", and many countries have elected to follow suit, I assume because of tradition. Basically: Their English is right for them, and our English is right for us, and neither is clearly superior in terms of authority.
Fraggle Rocker said:
You sound like a native speaker of Mandarin. I don't know where you hear the sound pronounced that way. Notice how you hold your tongue for the T. It's the same way you hold it to say "take." It is quite different from the shape and placement for "chain."
The sound is distinctly "ch"-like to me. I say this because if I focus, I
can make a more "t"-like sound like in "take" before R, and it will sound very different, almost like if you had a recording of someone saying "terrain", cut out the second half of the first syllable, and connected the two remaining pieces. Now that you've said it, my tongue is placed the same way as for the "t" sound, but it's just not a pure "t" sound for me. There's a "sh" sound involved, which I think is influenced by the position my tongue has to go into for the "r" sound. I think the phrase for it is secondary articulation.
Fraggle Rocker said:
I don't believe any sizeable community of native speakers says it that way and it's certainly not network-TV-announcer-standard American. Everyone should listen to a native speaker of standard Mandarin (not a dialect like Sichuan) say CH and you'll hear the sound in question. I don't believe it occurs in any major dialect of American English.
I hear it in a lot of people, even from British people who say "lit'rally". I would get some sort of sound recording to demonstrate so you could see what I'm talking about, but I'm on dial-up.