Evolution claims that vertebrates originated from a fish that had four fins. Every vertebrate has four limbs aside from dragons, which have forelegs, hindlegs, and a third set of limbs, which includes the wings. Scientifically speaking, insects can have more than 4 limbs, but they evolved from an entirely different line and colonized land much earlier than terrestrial vertebrate counterparts. How can evolution explain the existence of an animal that people have been seeing for thousands of years? Dragons are portrayed as reptiles and can only be realistically classified as such - the wings are not merely stumps but they have the ability of full uncompensated flight, in the manner of a bat or pterosaur, but pterosaurs had 4 limbs - 2 legs and 2 ''arms'' (which were wings).
Another problem with evolution is the existence of an oceanic dragon counterpart called the sea serpent. The sea serpent is not a snake, as it undulates vertically, forming many prominent arches above the water as a means of propulsion. From an evolutionary standpoint, evolution says that this cannot have evolved because reptiles do not undulate vertically and this would be an inefficient mode of propulsion, but thousands of honest people have seen them and the reports are way too consistent to dismiss or rule out as misidentification.
Another problem with evolution is the existence of an oceanic dragon counterpart called the sea serpent. The sea serpent is not a snake, as it undulates vertically, forming many prominent arches above the water as a means of propulsion. From an evolutionary standpoint, evolution says that this cannot have evolved because reptiles do not undulate vertically and this would be an inefficient mode of propulsion, but thousands of honest people have seen them and the reports are way too consistent to dismiss or rule out as misidentification.