I think I discovered a new particle, I need your opinion.

I thought that the apparent increase in "distance" between the two lines came from the way that the lens of the magnifying glass bent the light.
 
I thought that the apparent increase in "distance" between the two lines came from the way that the lens of the magnifying glass bent the light.

A magnifying glass does not increase the size of the light, the reverse reduces the size of the light.
 
The Veegtron is like the old theory of the Aether.
Many clever people believed in that for a long time.
Clerk Maxwell for example.
They also thought it was made of particles.

The universe is a distance:

lupa.jpg


Experiment carried out by:

Very affectionately,
Víctor Elias Espinoza Guedez
Scientific verification that the Veegtrón exists.
 
You looked at two lines through a magnifying glass.:bravo:

And then made your usual silly, nonsensical statements.
 
A magnifying glass does not increase the size of the light

But the shape, density, and material of the lens does change the way that photons move through it in such a way as to make things appear larger. There is no actual increase in the distance between the two lines, nor any actual physical change in anything you observe with a magnifying glass.

Why are you wasting time trying to explain things that have already been explained? Especially when your explanation is laughable at best?
 
But the shape, density, and material of the lens does change the way that photons move through it in such a way as to make things appear larger. There is no actual increase in the distance between the two lines, nor any actual physical change in anything you observe with a magnifying glass.

Why are you wasting time trying to explain things that have already been explained? Especially when your explanation is laughable at best?

A distance black as the space does not increase it's size a telescope, to see the stars and galaxies?
 
A change in apparent size is not necessarily a change in the actual size of the object being observed, sometimes it's just the image that's distorted(like with a telescope or a magnifying glass).
 
A change in apparent size is not necessarily a change in the actual size of the object being observed, sometimes it's just the image that's distorted(like with a telescope or a magnifying glass).

That all know, thank you for your contribution.
 
So you think that the altered image seen in a magnifying glass is the result of some unknown particle rather than the properties of the glass lens?
 
So you think that the altered image seen in a magnifying glass is the result of some unknown particle rather than the properties of the glass lens?

Yes, both atoms and the possible composition of the distance by a particle that is not seen.
 
Even allowing for language differences, that makes no sense.

But then, nothing you've EVER posted has made any sense.

Batshit crazy is the way to describe you.
 
Even allowing for language differences, that makes no sense.

But then, nothing you've EVER posted has made any sense.

Batshit crazy is the way to describe you.

Why enter the theme then?
 
So according to you, Victore, everything humans know about optics is bull?

Good that you say the magnifying lenses, told me a mechanic. That Magnifier enlarges nothing in the reality.

But if there is an increase in visual.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Isn't Veegtron that stuff they spread on sandwiches in Australia?
 
Back
Top