I thought that the apparent increase in "distance" between the two lines came from the way that the lens of the magnifying glass bent the light.
The Veegtron is like the old theory of the Aether.
Many clever people believed in that for a long time.
Clerk Maxwell for example.
They also thought it was made of particles.
Very small, the electrons exploit the Veegtrones to move inside the atom.
A magnifying glass does not increase the size of the light
But the shape, density, and material of the lens does change the way that photons move through it in such a way as to make things appear larger. There is no actual increase in the distance between the two lines, nor any actual physical change in anything you observe with a magnifying glass.
Why are you wasting time trying to explain things that have already been explained? Especially when your explanation is laughable at best?
A distance black as the space does not increase it's size a telescope, to see the stars and galaxies?
A change in apparent size is not necessarily a change in the actual size of the object being observed, sometimes it's just the image that's distorted(like with a telescope or a magnifying glass).
So you think that the altered image seen in a magnifying glass is the result of some unknown particle rather than the properties of the glass lens?
Even allowing for language differences, that makes no sense.
But then, nothing you've EVER posted has made any sense.
Batshit crazy is the way to describe you.
So according to you, Victore, everything humans know about optics is bull?
But if there is an increase in visual.
The universe is a distance: