Is Nibiru confirmed to exist?

You're lying. (Again).
What I see is someone who has been sucked into the woo and mystery of conspiracies, myths, hairy guys in the bush, Aliens conducting medical procedures etc, for so long now, that he just automatically jumps to whoever or whatever is pushing such nonsense, without much thinking.
 
What I see is someone who has been sucked into the woo and mystery of conspiracies, myths, hairy guys in the bush, Aliens conducting medical procedures etc, for so long now, that he just automatically jumps to whoever or whatever is pushing such nonsense, without much thinking.
I can't recall seeing evidence of him ever thinking.
 
What I see is someone who has been sucked into the woo and mystery of conspiracies, myths, hairy guys in the bush, Aliens conducting medical procedures etc, for so long now, that he just automatically jumps to whoever or whatever is pushing such nonsense, without much thinking.

No info pad .
 
No info pad .
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/planetx
Caltech researchers have found evidence suggesting there may be a "Planet X" deep in the solar system. This hypothetical Neptune-sized planet orbits our sun in a highly elongated orbit far beyond Pluto. The object, which the researchers have nicknamed "Planet Nine," could have a mass about 10 times that of Earth and orbit about 20 times farther from the sun on average than Neptune. It may take between 10,000 and 20,000 Earth years to make one full orbit around the sun.

"The possibility of a new planet is certainly an exciting one for me as a planetary scientist and for all of us," said Jim Green, director of NASA's Planetary Science Division. "This is not, however, the detection or discovery of a new planet. It's too early to say with certainty there's a so-called Planet X. What we're seeing is an early prediction based on modeling from limited observations. It's the start of a process that could lead to an exciting result."
 
Well neither do I find you can read .
Right...
Because I'm the one that posts links to NASA pages that are blank and claims there's info on them.
I'm the one that says NASA has discovered Planet 9 when it's actually Caltech that claims to have done so.
I'm the one that claims Planet 9 has been observed when in fact it hasn't.
Oh, wait, that was all you.
 
Right...
Because I'm the one that posts links to NASA pages that are blank and claims there's info on them.
I'm the one that says NASA has discovered Planet 9 when it's actually Caltech that claims to have done so.
I'm the one that claims Planet 9 has been observed when in fact it hasn't.
Oh, wait, that was all you.

I looked up the NASA SITE , to find the info on planet -9

It has been observed by NASA BUT NASA gives no info .

Why is that ? why does NASA give no info on planet-9 , yet it confirms planet-9 existence ?

Who knows ? but it is interesting why NASA doesn't .
 
It has been observed by NASA BUT NASA gives no info .
.

http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/planetx
"The possibility of a new planet is certainly an exciting one for me as a planetary scientist and for all of us," said Jim Green, director of NASA's Planetary Science Division.
"This is not, however, the detection or discovery of a new planet. It's too early to say with certainty there's a so-called Planet X. What we're seeing is an early prediction based on modeling from limited observations.
 
What interested in why you can't handle the truth .

What is Planet 9? | NASA
www.nasa.gov/collection-asset/what-is-planet-9/
Researchers have found evidence of a giant planet tracing a bizarre, highly elongated orbit in the outer solar system.
One more time: that page is essentially blank:
Jan. 22, 2016
What is Planet 9?
Last Updated: Jan. 25, 2016
Editor: Brian Dunbar
Tags: Kuiper Belt, Planets, Solar System

It certainly doesn't contain anything like your purported quote. And, as Paddoboy pointed out "evidence[1] is NOT observation[2]".

1 You've already been given a link that states quite clearly that the evidence is mathematical - NOT "observation".
2 The evidence is not definitively confirmed.
 
One more time: that page is essentially blank:
Jan. 22, 2016
What is Planet 9?
Last Updated: Jan. 25, 2016
Editor: Brian Dunbar
Tags: Kuiper Belt, Planets, Solar System

It certainly doesn't contain anything like your purported quote. And, as Paddoboy pointed out "evidence[1] is NOT observation[2]".

1 You've already been given a link that states quite clearly that the evidence is mathematical - NOT "observation".
2 The evidence is not definitively confirmed.

I see the same as pluto had evidence of its existence , and was later confirmed .
 
Back
Top