It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!

[paddoboy]

well obviously I need a co writer, who knows the correct jargon.

Get all the writers you wish. It will not change the state of play of the fact that you have no theory, no hypothesis, nothing worth considering, and no journal or even vixra would accept such nonsense.
That is a fact of life. as much as it will upset and frustrate you.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Just more delusional crap theorist that will gradually fade away when you fade away...Ho hum.

Are really trying to say that if you shut your eyes what you observe is not a constant ?

 

[paddoboy]

Your just being obtuse to the content and defining empty beyond no mass, such has an house brick.
You know very well what a constant is, and know dark is a constant without enough light.

No, I'm telling you what you see as empty space is not really empty.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Get all the writers you wish. It will not change the state of play of the fact that you have no theory, no hypothesis, nothing worth considering, and no journal or even vixra would accept such nonsense.
That is a fact of life. as much as it will upset and frustrate you.

and then science are fools, it is no loss to me.

 

[paddoboy]

and then science are fools, it is no loss to me.

Or more correctly, you will be no loss to science.

 

[Jason.Marshall]

We have a religious forum. take your religious crap there.

I will be on my way out paddoboy and remember you are an excellent creation of God maybe hopefully I could meet you one day and you could tell me many stories of the wonderful adventures you had in your lifetime I like stories am an artist don't know if I told you this?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

No, I'm telling you what you see as empty space is not really empty.

i could cry your been obtuse the content of which we speak, we are talking about light, in space there is no medium to create a refractive index, air has a little to no refractive index, it is see through. You are trying to change the context of the debate to suit your needs for argument, is stand by what i say and you are completely wrong.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Or more correctly, you will be no loss to science.

And it is that attitude while you are so useless and know very little, you think knowledge is smart, and it is not, smart is the ability to think, to work out by evidential accessing of information provided, to find the truth, and you just do not have the ability to do this.

 

[paddoboy]

4. I do not care to 4, laugh all you want because one day I will get the correct words and solid evidence everyone understands and the last laugh will not be on me.

FACT: You will never have a scientific paper, that anyone will ever accept, on the basis of your silly childish ideas you have put on this forum, and that have ALL been banished to Alternative, pseudo, and cesspool.

 

[paddoboy]

I will be on my way out paddoboy and remember you are an excellent creation of God maybe hopefully I could meet you one day and you could tell me many stories of the wonderful adventures you had in your lifetime I like stories am an artist don't know if I told you this?

I could tell you plenty. Start a thread in the appropriate forum. One is that I do not go into religious forums, preaching science.
The same respect to science from you would be appreciated.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

FACT: You will never have a scientific paper, that anyone will ever accept, on the basis of your silly childish ideas you have put on this forum, and that have ALL been banished to Alternative, pseudo, and cesspool.

Fact I could not care less what you think, you god trolls will not deter me, your only aim is to get threads of merit sent to the bin, and opps banned,
you are not forcing me to accept your lying discipline.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

prove white light is a mixture of frequencies in 3 dimensional space?

 

[paddoboy]

And it is that attitude while you are so useless and know very little, you think knowledge is smart, and it is not, smart is the ability to think, to work out by evidential accessing of information provided, to find the truth, and you just do not have the ability to do this.

Certainly I know very little in relation to the real scientists on this forum...I have never denied that....but just as certainly, [1] your ability to think is actually zero as you ignore all knowledge of the giants of the present and past, [2] You have zero, zilch, nada evidence to support any concept you have put. If you did have any, you would not be here and would get peer review and [3] You are constantly stating untruths with regards to any that refute your illogical inane position, probably due to frustration caused by your delusions and inflated ego.
And all I have said is there for all to read.

In summing, although everyone has the right to say and think whatever they like [and this does appear to be what some of the more radicalised alternative pushers such as yourself hang their hat on] everyone is also responsible for what they say and the possible effects on others.
In that respect your nonsense will be continually refuted for as long as necessary.
But again, now I must be off.

 

[paddoboy]

Fact I could not care less what you think, you god trolls will not deter me, your only aim is to get threads of merit sent to the bin, and opps banned,
you are not forcing me to accept your lying discipline.

Evidence?? Or is this just more of the frustrated "not getting anywhere" so I'll lie attitude of a troll?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Certainly I know very little in relation to the real scientists on this forum...I have never denied that....but just as certainly, [1] your ability to think is actually zero as you ignore all knowledge of the giants of the present and past, [2] You have zero, zilch, nada evidence to support any concept you have put. If you did have any, you would not be here and would get peer review and [3] You are constantly stating untruths with regards to any that refute your illogical inane position, probably due to frustration caused by your delusions and inflated ego.
And all I have said is there for all to read.

In summing, although everyone has the right to say and think whatever they like [and this does appear to be what some of the more radicalised alternative pushers such as yourself hang their hat on] everyone is also responsible for what they say and the possible effects on others.
In that respect your nonsense will be continually refuted for as long as necessary.
But again, now I must be off.

Oh the cop out, you can not give evidence because I already know there is none , white light in 3 dimensional space is unproven to be a mixture of frequencies.

I think this means something to the science people, I think this is how we see.

''Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a physical phenomenon in which nuclei in a magnetic field absorb and re-emitelectromagnetic radiation. This energy is at a specific resonance frequency which depends on the strength of the magnetic field and the magnetic properties of the isotope of the atoms; in practical applications, the frequency is similar to VHF andUHFtelevision broadcasts (60–1000 MHz).''

 

[billvon]

it is not fairy tales, you see in the dark in the daytime by sufficient intensity and sufficient spectral range , that is a true statement.

No, it is not a true statement in English. During the day (assuming an average day) it is not dark, by definition.

You remove the Sun, it becomes pitch black , you no longer can see

Correct. No photons hit your eyes, so you can't see. (Unless you have another illumination source, of course.)

you have neither intensity or range to see

You don't need "intensity" or "range" to see. All you need are photons entering your eyes. They can be direct (i.e. looking at the Sun) or reflected (i.e. looking at something illuminated by the Sun, or a lamp, or a laser.)

your brain has no coupling by electrical energy to matter and your vision is obscured by the dark.

Your vision is not obscured by the dark any more than your ears are obscured by silence, or your car is obscured by having an empty gas tank, or your light is obscured by being turned off. In all cases the items listed do not work because what they need to work is missing.

 

[paddoboy]

Climate change deniers and Islamic terrorists also think they have "undeniable logic" to support their causes.
I put it to you that you are not qualified, and are too biased as to be able to say one way or the other, whether you have "undeniable logic".
Your peers will be the judge of what is "undeniable logic" or "undeniable trash" ...If we ever get to see this so called "undeniable logic"

In the meantime for Interested observers and those that may have sympathies to other alternative hypothesis [ I'm sure we can safely leave this one out as it defies all common sense and logic]
The following is from an old thread, on how alternative theories/hypothesis should be put, and how they by necessity and the scientific method need to run the gauntlet, just as the present incumbent theories needed to.



[1] Don't present the theory as fact...don't present it as something that is "faite accompli" It most certainly isn't:

[2] Gather all the experimental and Observational evidence to support your claims...

[3] Whatever you have at the very least, must be able to explain and predict better then the incumbent model:

[4] Your theory almost certainly is going to be challenged, and will need to run the gauntlet:

[5] You will be told you are incorrect and your theory is wrong in most cases:

[6] Throwing a tantrum will not win you any support:

[7] You’re going to be asked tough questions. When someone asks you a question answer it.

[8] When someone demonstrates a point you made is wrong, acknowledge that it is wrong and accept it:

[9] Peer review may not be perfect, but it is absolutely necessary. The participants of any forum one sets out his alternative theory on, are your peers. Accept that:

[10] If you think you have accomplished a theory over riding Evolution, SR, GR the BB QM or Newton, you most certainly have not: 100 years and more of past giants, and the 100's of books and papers since, means that you will not invalidate such overwhelmingly supported ideas in a few words or posts: Accept that from the word go:

[11] In all likelyhood you are not Einstein, Newton, Hawking Bohr or Feynman: Don't pretend to be.

[12] And finally always be prepared to modify your ideas/model/theories:

and finally and in summing, with this nice little addition by Grumpy....

"Make damn sure that you understand current theory as it is presented by the "main stream" before you embark on your exploration of new frontiers. That is the starting point. Our recent troubles are caused by the fact that our would-be Hawkings don't even understand the first postulate(Relativity) and flat out deny the second postulate(constant, invariant c)yet still claim to understand the theory based only on those two postulates. This is not rationality, it is delusion".

In reality, in my time here, and on another forum, I have yet to see any alternative hypothesis put, that even looked like rising above the hypothesis definition, at least within the SR/GR Cosmology sciences.

 

[billvon]

And it is that attitude while you are so useless and know very little, you think knowledge is smart, and it is not, smart is the ability to think, to work out by evidential accessing of information provided, to find the truth, and you just do not have the ability to do this. . . ..
Im being scientific dream on pal...

From Wikipedia:
==================
Dunning–Kruger effect
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than is accurate. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude. Conversely, highly skilled individuals tend to underestimate their relative competence, erroneously assuming that tasks which are easy for them are also easy for others.

As David Dunning and Justin Kruger of Cornell University conclude, "the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others".

The phenomenon was first tested in a series of experiments published in 1999 by David Dunning and Justin Kruger of the Department of Psychology, Cornell University.The study was inspired by the case of McArthur Wheeler, a man who robbed two banks after covering his face with lemon juice in the mistaken belief that, as lemon juice is usable as invisible ink, it would prevent his face from being recorded on surveillance cameras. They noted that earlier studies suggested that ignorance of standards of performance lies behind a great deal of incorrect self assessments of competence. This pattern was seen in studies of skills as diverse as reading comprehension, operating a motor vehicle, and playing chess or tennis.

Dunning and Kruger proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will:

1. fail to recognize their own lack of skill;
2. fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
3. fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy;
4. recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill, if they are exposed to training for that skill.

==============================================

 

[theorist-constant12345]

I see the gang of troll's have been busy. Yeah yeah trolls heard it all before, I came to science expecting to speak to adults, not children who think they are in some way funny.

I do not care what you trolls think, you troll almost every forum with the same attitude. I do not suffer from Dunning-Kruger you idiots, several times I state I need someone to understand me with more superior knowledge , are you all this stupid?

Abstract - This paper is to show by logical axioms and Physical experimental observations that light is an illusion made by the mind and in reality it is never light and always dark and the perception is created by stimulus of electrical activity of light interacting with matter.

 

[AlexG]

I've got to wonder why the mods allow this craziness to go on and on. There is no value to any of TCs posts, just nonsense and rampant megalomania.