Men never set their feet on the Moon

[FatFreddy]

close proximity microphone would stop sound from more than a few feet away.

We read that's the kind of microphone they used. Who knows what they really used. If it's possible, it can't be ruled out because it's not what they said they did.

The videos, 50+ hours of it (why so much when "eagle eyed" hoax nuts are seeing "things"!) quite clearly show that the PLSS has significant mass, from their postures and the way it moves.

It doesn't look like it to me.

Physics of the Apollo Moon Walk
https://www.brighteon.com/7588098f-0e70-454c-851d-ae80d7e5254a
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...s/search?q=Steve+the+Chemist+Moon&FORM=VDMHRS

 

[FatFreddy]

Here's some more stuff I've found when I was googling around.

Smoking Gun Apollo Hoax Confirmation - Audio Analysis a16v.1432159

A16 Audio Analysis Summary

At the 1:40 time mark of the above video there are a couple of clips in which the astronaut drops a rock into a bag. The thud can be heard very clearly.

 

[David C]

We read that's the kind of microphone they used. Who knows what they really used. If it's possible, it can't be ruled out because it's not what they said they did.

You absurd person. So to augment your ludicrous claim they used hot mics (and of course you keep ignoring the implications of the seamless audio!) we now have incompetent NASA deciding to not only record audio in real time with all its pitfalls but they are going to use microphones that don't limit sound from farther away.

It doesn't look like it to me.

You've not even watched 1% of the footage, certainly not with educated eyes. You have no idea what you are looking for and you routinely deny the obvious. Nobody actually cares what things look like to you.

Physics of the Apollo Moon Walk

The idiot chemist and his idiot physics. His main claims revolve around what it appears to be, without this clown realising the cameras are very rarely level. No wonder you believe it.

 

[David C]

Here's some more stuff I've found when I was googling around.

Simple vibration through his glove and arm. He is hitting the side of the solid LRV.

At the 1:40 time mark of the above video there are a couple of clips in which the astronaut drops a rock into a bag. The thud can be heard very clearly.

Complete nonsense and the second vid also includes the crap from the first one. This is what happens when a deceptive hoax believer cherry pics tiny segments for audio transmission noises. All through the sequence at House Rock there are blips and clicks from the audio, this bloke has gone through it and found where they occur close to where a noise should occur. He has also done something dodgy with the sounds, the NASA versions are not the same. As for your "rock into a bag" I don't know what kind of rocks or bag you think they are using but that is distinctly metallic in nature and you claim it is a "thud"?

 

[FatFreddy]

As for your "rock into a bag" I don't know what kind of rocks or bag you think they are using but that is distinctly metallic in nature and you claim it is a "thud"?

It sounds like a thud to me. Aren't they dropping the rocks into bags of samples? Where's the metal that would cause a metallic sound?

 

[David C]

It sounds like a thud to me. Aren't they dropping the rocks into bags of samples? Where's the metal that would cause a metallic sound?

It sounds like a metallic noise and you are in denial. It's a communications noise, there are hundreds of them made throughout each EVA. This deceptive film maker has manipulated the sounds and selected isolated incidents where it appears to be in sync with something. If you watch a whole EVA from start to finish, you can hear dozens of noises where no action is taking place and loads of active collisions where there is no noise. It is moronic for you to claim they would be stupid enough to use open microphones.

 

[FatFreddy]

It is moronic for you to claim they would be stupid enough to use open microphones.

I think the microphones were in the helmets and they didn't have the three layers that you believe they had. Those suits were just costumes.

 

[David C]

I think

Please don't. Your thoughts are from a very ignorant place, unproven and uneducated speculation.

Try again : It is moronic for you to claim they would be stupid enough to use open microphones for a hoax. This means all dialogue must be live too and every possible sound made would have a chance of being picked up. The fact is that the dialogue WAS live - very natural and fitting with every situation.....but only an idiot would suggest doing that to fake it - on 12 videoed EVAs.

 

[FatFreddy]

At the 1:53 time mark he throws something that looks like a bag. It lands far from him but we can hear it land. How can that happen in a vacuum?

 

[candy]

Not only did we set foot on the moon on this date in 1971 we drove on the moon. I think the other guys are trying to steal the rover we parked there.

 

[FatFreddy]

Not only did we set foot on the moon on this date in 1971 we drove on the moon. I think the other guys are trying to steal the rover we parked there.

How about your addressing post #109. The video is the bottom one in post #102.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/men-never-set-their-feet-on-the-moon.164403/page-6#post-3680674

 

[candy]

How about your addressing post #109. The video is the bottom one in post #102.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/men-never-set-their-feet-on-the-moon.164403/page-6#post-3680674

No.

 

[David C]

How about your addressing post #109.

Why do you think people should educate you on things you are too dumb to have found out for yourself? You've been given all the information you need.

You're trolling/spamming this same bullshit on the politicalforum and houseofpolitics forum. You're as crazy now as you have always been. For some reason you think because you are too uneducated to understand stuff then your hopelessly ignorant opinion carries value. That's bizarre.

The latest crap is a bag hitting the ground supposedly passing through his visor assembly into his short range snoopy cap microphone. You still fail to acknowledge how incredibly stupid it is to attempt to fake any of this by using live microphones. You are the worst troll on the internet, bar none.

The film makers have taken isolated noises that appear to occur at moments expected and generalised this. That is just pure deceit. If you listen to any number of the 30 minute to 1hr segments of Apollo EVAs, random noises occur all the time where there is NOTHING happening and when something IS happening no noises whatsoever.

 

[FatFreddy]

The film makers have taken isolated noises that appear to occur at moments expected and generalised this.

That's quite a coincidence. He throws the bag and, when it hits the ground, it makes a noise exactly like one would expect a bag hitting the ground to sound like. You say that particular sound is an "isolated noise". Can you tell us what you think causes it?

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/men-never-set-their-feet-on-the-moon.164403/page-6#post-3680674
(bottom video, 1:53 time mark)

 

[David C]

That's quite a coincidence.

Nonsense. In 50 hours there are maybe a dozen noises in sync! But a thousand not. There are hundreds of events where there is no sound whatsoever.

He throws the bag and, when it hits the ground, it makes a noise exactly like one would expect a bag hitting the ground to sound like.

An idiotic claim just repeated, ignoring the need for it to be 1/ picked up through a layer of plexiglass 2/ on a microphone specifically for nearfield and directional to the voice 3/ and why the hell would they have live mics in the first place?

You say that particular sound is an "isolated noise". Can you tell us what you think causes it?

His breath, rustling his mouth against the mic, transmission noise from any number of electrical causes. The problem is that you lack any degree of critical thinking. It never occurs to you that cherry picking noises is deceptive, so long as it amounts to more of your useless "proof". You are unreachable like all conspiracy nuts on any subject, only in your case you simply don't know when to stop and find something productive to do. Your other latest thrill seems to be some of the most dangerous and disgraceful crap concerning vaccines.

 

[James R]

Buy into one conspiracy theory and chances are good that you'll also buy into many others as well. The lack of training in critical thinking carries over into all aspects of the conspiracy theorist's life, and as a result some of them end up wasting precious and unrecoverable slabs of it.

 

[FatFreddy]

Nonsense. In 50 hours there are maybe a dozen noises in sync! But a thousand not. There are hundreds of events where there is no sound whatsoever.

In real footage of a moon mission there wouldn't be any noises in sync. If there are other cases of stuff getting hit which aren't producing sound, the sound may have been removed. The Apollo fakers did a pretty sloppy job.

An idiotic claim just repeated, ignoring the need for it to be 1/ picked up through a layer of plexiglass 2/ on a microphone specifically for nearfield and directional to the voice 3/ and why the hell would they have live mics in the first place?

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/men-never-set-their-feet-on-the-moon.164403/page-6#post-3680674
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/men-never-set-their-feet-on-the-moon.164403/page-3#post-3680310

Those sounds are there and they correspond exactly to the actions that would make them. There are just too many for them to have been caused by other actions. There are several scenarios that would explain how the sound was picked up. We don't know what kind of microphones were really used or where they really were and the space costumes they were using might have had very light fabric that would let in sound. For all we know the people who were talking weren't even the ones in the suits. The ones doing the talking might have been off camera watching the action.

 

[David C]

In real footage of a moon mission there wouldn't be any noises in sync.

Bullshit. There are thousands of comms noises. The statistical chances of some happening in sync is enormous.

If there are other cases of stuff getting hit which aren't producing sound, the sound may have been removed.

Clown comment. So they "forgot" to remove some of the sounds that should never have been "recorded", because they were all morons using live microphones! You are the comedy troll.

Those sounds are there and they correspond exactly to the actions that would make them. There are just too many for them to have been caused by other actions. There are several scenarios that would explain how the sound was picked up. We don't know what kind of microphones were really used or where they really were and the space costumes they were using might have had very light fabric that would let in sound. For all we know the people who were talking weren't even the ones in the suits. The ones doing the talking might have been off camera watching the action.

You are taking the piss. This exact post appears on two other forums to my knowledge, you appalling spammer. You have to be a gigantic moron to suggest that they used off camera talking yet for some mental reason still used microphones. And all of this over 5 videoed missions, 12 EVAs (why so many !) which in itself is moronic. You are a complete waste of time. You fail in every pathetic argument you make and make no effort to think logically or with any degree of honesty.

 

[FatFreddy]

You are taking the piss. This exact post appears on two other forums to my knowledge, you appalling spammer. You have to be a gigantic moron to suggest that they used off camera talking yet for some mental reason still used microphones. And all of this over 5 videoed missions, 12 EVAs (why so many !) which in itself is moronic. You are a complete waste of time. You fail in every pathetic argument you make and make no effort to think logically or with any degree of honesty.

The anomaly of sounds in an alleged vacuum where there wouldn't be any sounds in a real moon mission is there. Our not knowing exactly how everything was recorded doesn't make the anomaly go away. The sound was picked up somehow. We may never figure out how they did everything but that anomaly is there and it proves the fakery.

 

[David C]

The anomaly of sounds in an alleged vacuum where there wouldn't be any sounds in a real moon mission is there.

Bare assertion doesn't work. You have had this exhaustively explained to you, but appear to be too thick to understand. There are hundreds and hundreds of clicks, scrapes, crackles, blips all over the 50+ hours of surface video. There is something like a dozen that occur when something meaningful happens. The people who suck you in like the gullible person you are, have isolated a few of this small number of sounds and easily tricked you into claiming these random and VERY infrequent noises are significant.

Our not knowing exactly how everything was recorded doesn't make the anomaly go away.

But we do know how they were recorded.

The sound was picked up somehow.

The rock strikes are conducted vibrations. The LM hit is simple microphonics through the relay. Many of the core tube "noises" are out of sync so cannot relate to actual strikes.

We may never figure out how they did everything but that anomaly is there and it proves the fakery.

What an idiotic statement. Somebody like you is actually incapable of working through data and problems logically. You pick your idiotic viewpoint immediately on every subject you infest, then refuse to consider how hopelessly wrong you are. Answer this and stop being a coward: why would they use microphones to simulate a vacuum?
It is just so incredibly stupid for anyone to film things with live microphones knowing that every bang and knock could get picked up!