NASA deceive American school children

[HawkI]

NASA ask young students to come up with a 'new name' for their latest robots. But in reality, the devices have been christened beforehand. Statistically, soo many nouns get suggested by the naive, that one one of them is bound to match.

 

[origin]

NASA ask young students to come up with a 'new name' for their latest robots. But in reality, the devices have been christened beforehand. Statistically, soo many nouns get suggested by the naive, that one one of them is bound to match.

Those bastards at NASA, how could they do this to our youths.

 

[Dywyddyr]

...one of them is bound to match.

So I'm still in with a shout on Botty McBotface?

 

[HawkI]

So I'm still in with a shout on Botty McBotface?

If NASA behind closed doors come up with such a name before asking the public for a 'new name' for their 'unnamed new machine' then yes.

 

[foghorn]

I hope I wasn't duped back in 2003. Anyone else here ''contribute''?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Impact_(spacecraft)

 

[Janus58]

I hope I wasn't duped back in 2003. Anyone else here ''contribute''?
View attachment 3924
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Impact_(spacecraft)

Not for the Deep_Impact probe, But I did for the Insight Mars lander ( One perk is that I'm pretty sure that my name will be be the only instance of that first and last name combination. While I do have a quite common first name, I have an uncommon last name. Such that there is only one other person in the US which shares my First/Last names, and he is a distant relative.)

 

[DaveC426913]

But in reality, the devices have been christened beforehand.

How do you know this?

 

[RainbowSingularity]

NASA ask young students to come up with a 'new name' for their latest robots. But in reality, the devices have been christened beforehand. Statistically, soo many nouns get suggested by the naive, that one one of them is bound to match.

how it works is fairly simple
they have a general range of names
types of names & similar names
the name that comes closest to one of those groupings of names becomes the name

they are not about to allow someone to name it "anal explorer 1" just because that person was 1st or last

Deep_Impact probe

...

dont allow your imagination to get abducted by aliens

NASA behind closed doors

delux editors choice
high light reel
. . .

what is in a name ...

 

[HawkI]

How do you know this?

A whistle blower among NASA entrusted in me to get the truth out there. They wish to remain anonymous.

 

[DaveC426913]

A whistle blower among NASA entrusted in me to get the truth out there. They wish to remain anonymous.

So, another "Hawkiism" then.

 

[RainbowSingularity]

A whistle blower among NASA entrusted in me to get the truth out there. They wish to remain anonymous.

you specifically said

the devices have been christened beforehand.

which is a religious process

are you talking about a religious process ?
or
a naming process
they are 2 completely different things
10 year old children build conspiracy theory's of why the smart empathic kids get to guess the correct name for something they wanted to name "big poop"

they then whine & complain and say the world is not fair and against them, then they go outside a beat up another kid to steal their lunch money and get a power trip
then they become child predators and incels and nazis and politicians or conspiracy theorists

 

[DaveC426913]

[christening] is a religious process

It started that way, but is no longer a religious ceremony.

Christen: dedicate (a vessel, building, etc.) ceremonially.

Plenty of references online that describe christening without any religious aspect.

 

[RainbowSingularity]

It started that way, but is no longer a religious ceremony.

Christen: dedicate (a vessel, building, etc.) ceremonially.

Plenty of references online that describe christening without any religious aspect.

christ enabling

nasa when it was constructed was comprised of the American christian people
its religion was Christianity
nasa has always been inherently leaned toward Christianity because the majority religion & culture has been christian

anyone with half a brain who has followed space technology should know this
which suggests hawkls thread is some type of religious trolling
or is a conspiracy theory wrapped inside a conspiracy theory

additionally to add to hawkl attempted conspiracy theory of a conspiracy theory of a religious troll process
just because someone has been "blessed" aka christened, does not mean it can not then be named

from my reading most religions have various naming process that never create an ultimate non changing name process

so this on a religious concept places another concept of conspiracy inside hawkls conspiracy

which now begs the question
is hawkl a religious person? a communist ?
an anarchist ?
because the motive of the nature of controlling the debate narratives has become the thing

It started that way, but is no longer a religious ceremony.

what you re obviously not aware of, is
some Christians will take it upon themselves to have secret christenings of such things.
such a behavior does not intimidate my own spiritual beliefs
be they indigenous or imperialist introduced religions

hawkls use of the religious word while deliberately mixing it with "naming"
in a science debate area
is clearly defining a conspiracy of religious definition

but
the real world reality is little different to feeling emotionally injured by someone giving a prey to a launching rocket
to exploit that association to a child domain is a bit divisive

disingenuous or deliberately manipulative to engage what about children ?

you think you smell smoke when i see the fire

psychological baiting
children
rights
Christianity
rights to self validation
anarchy

conspiracy inside the conspiracy inside the conspiracy of a conspiracy ...

 

[DaveC426913]

 

[RainbowSingularity]

the alt right have been targeting nasa for decades
using the conservative christians anti science support to undermine science in schools & destabilize nasa as a Government science organization while stealing their funding.

so the question is who is hawkl

so this idea to try & create a beat up of nasa & create a conspiracy they are attacking school children is very vile
& is probably alt-right conservative christians looking for an out while texans die from lack of social services and to divert attention away from government funding of utilities

they will feed this bullshit to their followers to keep them on the hook like smack addicts

 

[RainbowSingularity]

not very original for a conspiracy theory

 

[RainbowSingularity]

NASA deceive American school children
NASA ask young students to come up with a 'new name' for their latest robots. But in reality, the devices have been christened beforehand. Statistically, soo many nouns get suggested by the naive, that one one of them is bound to match.

technically that's defamation of a USA govt agency which is involved in vital & critical education of children
as well as globally critical scientific research & development

the burden of proof becomes the question to substantiate such a claim
AND you would need to prove a motive to an ends of what they are attempting to trick school children into believing or how they are tricking them with proof.

your theory is lacking motive.

 

[HawkI]

which suggests hawkls thread is some type of religious trolling
or is a conspiracy theory wrapped inside a conspiracy theory

Christen: dedicate (a vessel, building, etc.) ceremonially.

I simply wanted to use another word for naming, that means the same thing. A thesaurus makes writing more interesting.

technically that's defamation of a USA govt agency which is involved in vital & critical education of children
as well as globally critical scientific research & development

I promised NASA employee, Stooge Straw Man, that his identity is safe with me.

your theory is lacking motive.

Their motive is to brainwash the children who randomly get the right names into a life time of wanting to work for NASA. Did you see the boy and girl who got the right names recently? They were saying in an almost robotic voice 'Ever.... Since.... I..... Named.... It.... I..... Want.... To..... Be..... In..... That..... Room.'

 

[foghorn]

So, another "Hawkiism" then.

In my dictionary under ''Hawkiism'' it reads...'' You can believe me when I say this because this guy I know told me so. Often followed by 'mum's the word' and tapping side of nose gesture'' .

 

[DaveC426913]

Hawki: so you see the problem with having too much fun. The problem is called Poe's Law:

"without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the views being parodied."

For example:

technically that's defamation of a USA govt agency which is involved in vital & critical education of children
as well as globally critical scientific research & development

the burden of proof becomes the question to substantiate such a claim
AND you would need to prove a motive to an ends of what they are attempting to trick school children into believing or how they are tricking them with proof.

your theory is lacking motive.