Guess could be true. What ever exist now always has and always will be
Even if the Universe continues to expand until (my favourite theory) even the binding energy of atoms comes apart.
Not necessarily true.If the universe never began it can't expand, it's just endless space out there.
Not necessarily true.
If I multiply 1 by 10, and then by 10, and then by 10, each time I do so the number expands (exponentially so, but that is beside the point).
Now consider that each multiplication is a set period of time.
If I start at 100 and want to see what happened in the past, I divide by 10, again each division a set period of time.
So I get 10, 1, 1/10, 1/100 etc.
All the way to asymptotically to zero (i.e. it never quite reaches, no matter how long I keep dividing).
With that principle you could thus get a universe that has always existed and expands.
Not saying it is what we have, only that what you said isn't necessarily true.
If you are too lazy to open a link, I don't own that.Yes, scripture is "jam packed" with examples. And yet you have still not been able to list a single one. You have failed completely.
The theist doth protest too much, methinks.
So, Musika concedes his case, by being too lazy to actually bring it to the table for comment.If you are too lazy to open a link, I don't own that.
Well I did find 4 links that are representative or at least coming from the four most influential schools of religious thought in our world.So, Musika concedes his case, by being too lazy to actually bring it to the table for comment.
You had a chance to answer. You couldn't do it. You have forfeited; live with it.In this case, it is not me who owns the limitation.
You didn't provide a link to a single example.If you are too lazy to open a link, I don't own that.
Um.You had a chance to answer. You couldn't do it. You have forfeited; live with it.
You didn't provide a link to a single example.
So now that you've failed to provide even a single example, you are trying to lie your way out of it.
No wonder theists are in severe decline.
If you would rather talk about your ideas than click on links, that's your perogative.And you can't even produce a single passage of Scripture to support your claim. At least the Flat Earthers can come up with arguments. I mean, they are nonsense, but at least they have the integrity to put them out there.
Pretty sad that you can't even measure up to the Flat Earthers.
Guess you missed it repeatedly due to your fixation on identity politics.Not by an overt or claimed theist.
After 16 pages, not a single example.
The closest approach is in post 197.
Nope. There is no such post on this thread.Guess you missed it repeatedly due to your fixation on identity politics.
On the plus side, we at least have your decision to temporarily lay off the "abrahamic" BS for a few posts at least.Nope. There is no such post on this thread.
There is no such thing as time.Long long long time atheist here
There is no such thing as time.
*boom*
(Sorry all, couldn't resist. Carry on.)
You are already proved wrong.Nope - because you haven't posted any links to that example you promised in Scripture. You just Googled and linked to four results you found, one of which was a long list of vaguely related Biblical passages.
You are a dishonest liar, and your only recourse seems to be claiming you did things you did not.
Want to prove me wrong? Then do so. You have claimed that Scripture is "jam packed" with examples. Give us one. Not a Google search result, or a Youtube video you found through a Google search. Just one example of what you claimed the Bible is "jam packed" with.
You couldn't do it, could you. You couldn't even post a single piece of Scripture to validate your claim. Sad!You are already proved wrong.
You're wasting your time. He's a typical theist; he'd rather play games with you and dance around the issues than engage in any meaningful discussion. He knows he can't really argue cogently on this.It isn't obvious. Give us an honest answer for a change.
You're wasting your time. He's a typical theist; he'd rather play games with you and dance around the issues than engage in any meaningful discussion. He knows he can't really argue cogently on this.