So you consider this info to be irrelevant.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/h-r-5181.158636/page-2#post-3435242
An objecitve truth-seeker would try to determine whether it was true or not. You haven't proven it's untrue so you should at least be curious.
So why don't you take your own medicine? Your steadfast refusal to recognize reason and evidence doesn't mean I haven't made my case. I've pointed out several times now your argument doesn't hold water. You have refused to recognize the last century.
You're grossly misrepresenting my position. The issue I raised is what the German people and soldiers were thinking during the war. I don't rule out the idea that he was lying to the people to get them to unwittingly support imperialist policies.
Unfortunately for you, I'm not. You haven't provided any evidence to support your contention that the American press misrepresented the German people or their intentions. You comrade are doing what you do best, i.e. cherry picking. You are being intellectually dishonest.
It's good of you not to rule out the idea that Hitler might have lied to his people. But that really isn't the issue here. It isn't relevant to your contentions about the American press or Bradley's book.
Now please address the issue I raised. Don't address a different issue and pretend you've addressed the issue.
Unfortunately for you comrade I have addressed the issues you have raised several times now. Your ignoring and denying them isn't going to change anything comrade. You have to ignore the last century in an attempt to make sense of your beliefs.
You keep ignoring the two cases of blatant dishonesty by the mainstream that shows that the mainstream isn't trustworthy. You just keep insisting that mainstream info is credible. You keep saying I haven't proven that the US is an imperialist ower in the world. Do you think that you've proven it isn't?
I've ignored nothing. Just because you don't like reality, it doesn't mean I've ignored anything comrade. Your problem is you haven't proven "mainstream" sources aren't credible as you need them to be. So you resort to fake news and other equally specious sources.
What this response is is an avoidance of what I asked you to address. Here it is again. Please address it.
You are repeating yourself comrade? Have you noting else to say? You are obfuscating comrade. You cannot defend your assertions, so you continue to obfuscate.
Again you just avoided addressing an issue. You have an authoritative patronizing attitude but what you're actually saying would get you laughed out of the debating hall.
The only one avoiding the issues here is you comrade. I have repeatedly pointed out the holes in your assertions. You continue to pretend it never happened. You have steadfastly refused to recognize the last century. Your best evidence for your contention is an American general who lived more than a century ago. You have steadfastly refused to recognize things have changed, and those changes have been specifically brought to your attention.
Denial isn't a river in Egypt comrade.
Again you just avoided addressing an issue. You have an authoritative patronizing attitude but what you're actually saying would get you laughed out of the debating hall.
Pointing out your hypocrisy and your refusal to recognize evidence, and that before you accuse others of something you should take a long and serious look at yourself isn't avoiding the issue comrade. It is the issue.
I know you now you pro-official version posters will just tap dance around when you're checkmated in a debate so my goal here is not to make you admit anything. I know you're going to stick to your position hell or high water so you'll have to say some pretty lame things to maintain your position. You've said some pretty lame things and all of the viewers have seen them so your credibility is pretty much shot. There's really not much else for me to do here.
Yeah, you don't like credible sources of information. I think we have well established that fact. Instead you prefer specious and obviously false sources of information. And when your errors are pointed out to you you obfuscate. You initiate personal attacks, and when all else fails, you resort to beating your chest and declaring yourself victorious. The internet is full of people like you comrade.
Unfortunately for you, not everyone is as brain dead and as uneducated as you need them to be. You have to ignore a century of history in an attempt to make sense of your assertions.
