#trumpswindle | #WhatTheyVotedFor
Sixty-two million nine hundred eighty-four thousand, eight hundred twenty-five.
First, it was controversial because of the timing: Trump meeting with Russian officials the day after firing Comey looked ridiculous.
Then it was a little more controversial because American journalists were excluded.
Then it was a little more controversial because a journalist from a state-run media outlet in Russia wasn’t excluded.
Then it was a little more controversial because of the security risk.
Then it was a little more controversial because White House officials said Russia had “tricked” them.
Then it was a little more controversial because Lavrov brought along Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, a detail the White House readout neglected to mention, and something we only know because Russia acknowledged it. Kislyak, of course, is the official Michael Flynn talked to before he lied about it and got fired.
And then it was a little more controversial because the entire meeting happened at Vladimir Putin’s request, and Trump didn’t feel as if he could say no.
(Benen↱)
This is #WhatTheyVotedFor.
Remember, when all is said and done, there were sixty-two million nine hundred eighty-four thousand, eight hundred twenty-five who wanted this.
We might bear this in mind because, in the future, they might pretend to have something to say, but first we might oblige them to overcome the burden of explaining to us just why we should listen to them. And, you know, because they're Americans and they're pissed off and they have guns won't be good enough.
Sixty-two million nine hundred eighty-four thousand, eight hundred twenty-five of our American neighbors owe us an explanation for their deliberate betrayal of the United States of America.
No wonder so many people who argue the Trump party line want us to believe they didn't vote for him. You know, we didn't really believe that about the, "I'm not a racist, but", or, "I'm not a sexist but", people, either. When what comes after that "but" is the standard fare, we don't believe they're not part of it.
Does anyone remember the supremacist tossed salad bit? How the melting pot used to mean, to racists, that others should abandon their own cultural traditions and adopt white-Christian standards, and then the argument that white people were persecuted became popular so someone came up with this weird tossed salad metaphor that never made any sense, but left lettuce to be lettuce and the interloping tomatoes to be tomatoes, or some such?
I always loved the "I'm not racist but you're wrong about the melting pot, it's a tossed salad" argument; yeah, actually when you say that you probably are racist.
And the people who argue the Trump party line while pretending they didn't vote for him are also, in most cases, lying.
The simple fact is that as we look around for Trump voters to answer for their betrayal, it will be harder and harder to find actual Trump voters, but there will suddenly be plenty of, "I'm not a Trump voter", advocates complaining a party-line recitation about persecuting Trump voters by asking them to explain themselves.
You know, all they did was vote to sell their country to a foreign power, how dare anyone wonder.
So, who is going to stand up and defend the traitors?
Don't get me wrong, there can be a perfectly rational explanation for voting against the United States of America. There can be a perfectly rational explanation for for their enthusiastic, traitorous betrayal.
However, it should be stated that no, being too stupid to comprehend what you've done is not an excuse. Ignorance
chosen is certainly not bliss. And, frankly, given the danger such general ignorance presents, neither is stupidity a proper excuse for what they've done.
But, seriously, they voted for a Puti-Poodle; I think the rest of us deserve an explanation—
Dear Trump voters: Why did you betray your country?
____________________
Notes:
Benen, Steve. "Controversial Oval Office meeting was held at Putin's request". msnbc. 12 May 2017. msnbc.com. 14 May 2017. http://on.msnbc.com/2pLUWjO