Oh, no. She said "atheist".
Well I'm trying to give him an opt out of belonging in the same group as the majority of Samites here
Oh, no. She said "atheist".
WillNever: "[race] Doesn't matter my ass. If it didn't matter, they'd freely tell us."
No, it doesn't matter. They can't all tell if we'redogsracists on the internet. But at Sciforums, more people than average can.
At least the noob can piece together whole thoughts in contemporary English.
lol @ the arab muslim
.....It took multiple questions to get them to finally admit that they weren't even American, all the while they stated that "it didn't matter.".............
thank heavens for that. after all there really is not much more to tout now, is there?
/applauds
Bashing the crowd that is pleased to continually advertise the fact (or at least the claim) that they are American, is not the same thing as bashing America.willnever said:They just didn't want their non-Americaness to be exposed in a discussion in which they bashed America.
Hypewaders said:
Mod Thought: Is this thread ready for About the Members yet?
Well, I would. :m:Pigs around a synagogue is not offensive in any way, shape or form. If I were jewish, I wouldn't be offended by that.
Its a simple matter of respect and common decency. Something that is severely lacking these days, and ultimately reduces to ignorance. eace:In the meantime, we've got muslims here who have expressed annoyance at the image of an exposed muslim girl who they don't even know. It would be one thing if the depiction was of their naked muslim girlfriend... but this is someone else, with her own mind, her own beliefs, and her OWN body. Why should they be offended if she decides to show her boobs to other people? Do they claim ownership of her boobs, or what? Nudity is normal, natural, and healthy. Why on *earth* does that image strike a chord with them?
You are psychic ...Jeepers there's Straw dog too, Hmm maybe atheist Jew of unknown Mizrahi origin? Oh well, one not so white, non-Muslim Arab
"the member/mod schizophrenia"
What?[ ]
Modnote/edit: Too far off-topic.]
Member Note: I'monly narcissi, isissi (how2spell?) issisticallynot a mod here
We could discuss whether it may be the result of constant American interference, aggression and slaughter of our Iraqi friends? Not to mention the plight of our Palestinian brothers? And our Lebanese, Syrian, Afghan, Pakistani and Iranian brothers? And perhaps the assumption that every person of ME appearance (yes, even Mizrahim) is a vile terrorist?You are right. I do believe we need to start a separate thread titled "Muslims and their higher than average tendency to hate America."
In it we can first discuss the validity of the claim that muslims tend to hate American more than usual and why that is. Could it be a result of their religious indoctrination? Is it merely a cultural value? Or are current world events changing their minds for the worse?
Of course, and balance this with some anti Iranian and anti Muslim, Christian opinions of apocalyptic doomsday scenarios.We can bring in various anti-American, muslim opinions for this fascinating discourse.
StrawDog said:We could discuss whether it may be the result of constant American interference, aggression and slaughter of our Iraqi friends? Not to mention the plight of our Palestinian brothers? And our Lebanese, Syrian, Afghan, Pakistani and Iranian brothers? And perhaps the assumption that every person of ME appearance (yes, even Mizrahim) is a vile terrorist?
I can`t speak for all,but perhaps the stance has simply to do with a sense of justice. :m:Okay. So the same-sided anti-American stance we are seeing from you (all) is born of ethnic solidarity and emotional bias.
Now you see why no one took your question as in good faith - it wasn't.willnever said:Okay. So the same-sided anti-American stance we are seeing from you (all) is born of ethnic solidarity and emotional bias.
The "confusing" part is the part quoted: "They just didn't want their non-Americaness to be exposed in a discussion in which they bashed America." Whatever did the lad mean by "exposed"? That seems to imply concealment, the discovery of something lowly or damaging. But he claims not to have meant such. So we have a bit of a mystery.willnever said:On second thought, you need to go back and reread my post. You didn't understand it.
I can`t speak for all,but perhaps the stance has simply to do with a sense of justice. :m:
Its difficult to explain a sense of justice to those who have no concept of it.
And how do we know that those who explain to us sense of justice have that sense in the first place, or justice from the same point of view?
For the record, I'm ... 6'1 and 165 lbs or so.
Any more questions..?
Okay, one more time for the socially inept.exactly. put up or shut up
frikkin troll
Okay, sycophant, since you lack reading and comprehension skills, my point to Sam was based off her own words. I would suggest you read through the rest of the thread and see her response to my proposition that she may just not know the details behind the Holocaust, because she has or had no real interest in it aside from how similar it might relate to the plight of Palestinians.ah, still trolling with the disingenuous innuendos and sneaky insinuations. this incessant questioning of motives. you obviously lack both principles and the courage of your fanatical convictions.
That you are acting like a fool and a troll? Yes, that I know.it will never be enough for you, bells, now would it? because deep deep down inside, you know!