Split: SAM's intellectual dishonesty and poor moderation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sam why don't you go back to patrolling your Biology threads?
Could it be because they are DEAD? I wonder why hmmmmm....
 
Yea, dream on.. I'll be banned before I can blink my eyes.
I think what you are doing is particularly childish... just give it up.
 
Enmos said:
Yea, dream on.. I'll be banned before I can blink my eyes.
I think what you are doing is particularly childish... just give it up.
Click to expand...

I bet the EU would support me, champions of freedom of expression that they are.
 
Let me suggest User CP> Edit Options> Visible Post Elements>Show avatars
 
whitewolf said:
I don't know how she moderates, I don't really care. But I disagree with the charge of intellectual dishonesty: in order to have that quality, one must possess intellect; she doesn't have any. She snipped facts here and there and keeps repeating them without hope to make sense to herself or anyone else. A parrot can do that also.

Someone said she's the nicest, whatever. Sciforums is not for being nice to everyone, sciforums is for contributing intellectually interesting material.
Click to expand...


I said that. It is irrelevant, but the title of this thread makes her sounds bad.
I have met many intelligent people and many nice people but people who
are both nice and intelligent are rare, so I just wanted to add that because
that is a plus point of her. In sciforums, however, they are easier to find
(those who are both intelligent and nice).

About she doesn't possess intellect, hummm I disagree. She has by far the
highest post count and you can see the quality just by clicking her post history.
That could be something subjective, sure. Anyway, how can she be appointed
as moderator of biology & genetic, science & society, and formal debates? :shrug:

However, I completely agree with you that sciforums is place for contributing
intellectually interesting material. I can't contribute anything significant yet,
but I wanted to support SAM's moderation, especially because the women
moderator in this forum are already rare enough (only Sam and Bells, yes?).
Its good that we have them among forum leaders to represent me and other
women in this science forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top