Ruining things is man's specialty.
You're still dead, by the way.
You're still dead, by the way.
Not in reality. Instead of 100 000 people you should have made it 4 or 5 pussies. Then, maybe, but still probably not.In a society that has never had an incident of human on human violence, there is chance for a clean slate.
Are you going to kill me personally? If not you're dictating others again.You will ruin your chances of survival when you attempt to commit human on human violence for no reason.
Isn't creating a society that functions on specific pre-set rules dictating society?No it will not. I am speaking for myself. It is you who try to dictate the society.
Are you crazy? In a society where there are no institutions powers, violence is the first thing that is a necessity.In a society that has never had an incident of human on human violence, there is chance for a clean slate.
Wrong. Not if we put a stop to human on human violence.Violence is like death. You can try to put it off, but at some point you'll be forced into it.
1. No dictating to a society is what you are doing. Telling people how they will orwill not respond to the ideas presented.Isn't creating a society that functions on specific pre-set rules dictating society?
Are you crazy? In a society where there are no institutions powers, violence is the first thing that is a necessity.
Wrong. Not if we put a stop to human on human violence.
I'm not telling peope how they'll do anything, but I can guess pretty accurately. Anyway, any government that can be established will dictate society.1. No dictating to a society is what you are doing. Telling people how they will orwill not respond to the ideas presented.
How would you decide who's ideas are the best?2. Violence is the first thing that is NOT necessary.
Get real I dare you to go get a brain. The objective is to put a stop on human on human violence.
The fact that you complain about something good goes to show what a brainwashed slave you are.
Anybody that wants to perpetuate violence is a brainwashed slave.
A taste of reality for you then.I created plans that I began describing in this thread.
Not a single person adressed the plans or provided their own plans.
Most of the posts in this thread by others either involved killing people or some other form of nonsense.
But you don't have the time. You've got to find food before you starve. If a hundred thousand people start eating and walking, they will clear the forest of nuts and berries faster than they can walk. By the third day they will have walked 60 miles and completely stripped a circle 120 miles in diameter of everything edible. There isn't enough wild food in an area that size to sustain anywhere near 100,000 people, so most of them will be starving.Everything is in walking distance if you have the time. Last one to Hawaii is a rotten egg!
It is obvious that you do not.Do you have any understanding of people whatsoever?
A taste of reality for you.A taste of reality for you then.
People aren't going to behave how you'd like them to, and your plan in no way compensated for this inevitability.
This seems more like a better solution than telling everybody to leave and go fend for themselves if they are not happy with the majority situation.What if your ideals aren't of a peaceful nature? Then accommedating everyone peacefully may not be in your criteria. A good policy would be to create multiple different kinds of society that are fit to ALL the different types of people, and kept out of poverty by a central government with no legal obligation except to maintain trade and prevent the societies from imposing their will on the other societies, and to orginize armies in the event that part of the population will become resource hungy in the future. Rather than prison, those who disobey the rules of local society could simply be transfered to another society, that better fits their living style.