Why?? : o(
A computer WOULD stop counting: they have a maximum number. As for the field of mathematics...?
A computer WOULD stop counting: they have a maximum number. As for the field of mathematics...?
If they didn't run, they didn't run. Something that didn't happen didn't take 0.00 seconds. It just didn't happen.They ran it in 0.00 seconds.
If they didn't finish the race, you can't attribute a time.But they entered the race.
No. They didn't finish at all.They finished as or before they began.
"Fastest" is defined as speed. Speed is distance over time.The fastest person to run one-hundred metres ran it in 0.00 seconds. They entered but did not run: a record that will never be broken.
Try 2 / 3:Add one to what you're dividing, add one to what you're dividing by, and subtract one from the total. (+1÷+1)-1.
Who can't divide by zero? Add one to what you're dividing, add one to what you're dividing by, and subtract one from the total. (+1÷+1)-1.
It's very simple. I can't believe you didn't know that. Now I've told you why don't you see if you can ever discover the answer for yourself. ☺
No, I'm just dividing two by three using your method. If your method supposedly works for dividing by zero, why doesn't it work for dividing by three?You're dividing two by three by zero. ☺
He's not serious.No, I'm just dividing two by three using your method. If your method supposedly works for dividing by zero, why doesn't it work for dividing by three?
I invoke Poe's Law.He's not serious.
He will recant after reading post 32, which uses his logic rigorously, and results in a complete breakdown of the number system.
Granted.I invoke Poe's Law.
Stay in school. You won't regret it when you're older.I am serious!
You were joking of course.
I invoke Poe's Law.