# The tides are the result of the rotation of the Earth and the whirlpools

The length of the tidal wave depends on the diameter of the whirlpool. And the height of the tidal wave depends on the rotation speed of the whirlpool of the orbital velocity of the Earth, and the time of the tilting of the whirlpool (12 hours).
A = V1 • V2 / t
where: A is the amplitude of the tidal wave (precession angle).
V1 - rotation speed of the whirlpool.
V2 is the orbital velocity of the Earth.
t - the time of tilting of the whirlpool (12 hours).
So the amplitude of the wave has the units of \$\$m^2/hr^3\$\$ or is it \$\$Degrees^2/hr^3\$\$?

Hmm, either way, I think I detect a problem....

Last edited:
So the amplitude of the wave has the units of \$\$m^2/hr^3\$\$ or is it \$\$Degrees^2/hr^3\$\$?
Hmm, either way, I think I detect a problem....
Don't be dissing his math! He thought about that math for many moments. And anyway, it's the whirlpools, not the math.

He thought about that math for many moments.
Well that cracked me up.

So the amplitude of the wave has the units of \$\$m^2/hr^3\$\$ or is it \$\$Degrees^2/hr^3\$\$?

Hmm, either way, I think I detect a problem....

Specifically where ?

Are you asking where is the problem?
Ever the optimist, I see.......

Good source;
The gravitational pull of the sun and moon on the earth also causes waves. These waves are tides or, in other words, tidal waves. It is a common misconception that a tidal wave is also a tsunami. The cause of tsunamis are not related to tide information at all but can occur in any tidal state.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/wavesinocean.html

Is it correct to say that all wave functions transmit energy?

ls it correct to say that all wave functions transmit energy?
No.

A wave function is a mathematical description of the state of an isolated quantum system, and mathematical descriptions do not transfer energy.
It would be correct to say all waves transmit or transfer energy.

No.

A wave function is a mathematical description of the state of an isolated quantum system, and mathematical descriptions do not transfer energy.
It would be correct to say all waves transmit or transfer energy.
I see the chronic inability of Write4U to use the terms "function" and "wave function" correctly continues unabated. All part of the wider inability to discriminate between physical entities and mathematical models.

Keep up the good work. I have not the patience, myself.

I see the chronic inability of Write4U to use the terms "function" and "wave function" correctly continues unabated.
It just seems like it would be so easy for him to learn to use the terms correctly, but i am just fooling myself. His reply to my post will probably be more of the same, but I can hope.

No.

A wave function is a mathematical description of the state of an isolated quantum system, and mathematical descriptions do not transfer energy.
It would be correct to say all waves transmit or transfer energy.
Thanks for the correction. It was sloppy posting. From the link I posted.
Waves transmit energy, not water, and are commonly caused by the wind as it blows across the ocean, lakes, and rivers. Waves caused by the gravitational pull of the moon and the sun are called tides. The ebb and flow of waves and tides are the life force of our world ocean.
...

Last edited:
It just seems like it would be so easy for him to learn to use the terms correctly, but i am just fooling myself. His reply to my post will probably be more of the same, but I can hope.
I don't know what prompted you to make such a comment. Oh, yes, I do....

It just seems like it would be so easy for him to learn to use the terms correctly, but i am just fooling myself. His reply to my post will probably be more of the same, but I can hope.
I for one am actually quite fascinated to see somebody knowingly post such gibberish while at the same time thinking they are making sense. The cognitive dissonance and the mental gymnastics required to maintain that state of mind for a prolonged time is truly amazing, and in my opinion, much more impressive than that person simply learning how to use terms correctly.

(Note: I am not mentioning any specific person.)

Thanks for the correction. It was sloppy posting. From the link I posted.

It just seems like it would be so easy for him to learn to use the terms correctly, but i am just fooling myself. His reply to my post will probably be more of the same, but I can hope.
I think it is the same phenomenon one encounters with creationists. They can't afford to let go of an idea that they have built a whole belief system around, even when it is shown to be false.

I have come to the conclusion that Write4U has this religion of the universe consisting of mathematics. The constant conflation of mathematical and physical concepts is important to him for enabling this idea to be sustained. It enables him to flip-flop between the two at will and thereby suggest - if only to himself- that maths is physical.

This must be the key to why he is so resistant to learning the distinction: he does not want to. It could undermine the belief system.

if only to himself- that maths is physical.
No, I do not believe maths is (are) physical, I believe all physics are mathematical, difference...

Last edited:
Allow me to rephrase my original question.
"Is it correct to say that all waves transmit energy"?

Allow me to rephrase my original question.
"Is it correct to say that all waves transmit energy"?
Any travelling wave does so, yes.

A standing wave is not moving, so it cannot transmit energy, though it does contain energy.

No, I do not believe maths is (are) physical, I believe all physics are mathematical, difference...
I have no confidence that you will not say or imply the opposite tomorrow, I'm afraid.

For reference: "Tidal forces in nature - the statement that the center of the Earth is less attracted by the Moon than the surface of the Earth due to its remoteness." The degree of heterogeneity of the gravitational field of the Earth depends on the distance from the Center of the Earth to the Earth's surface. And the larger the radius of the planet, the greater the heterogeneity of the gravitational field.
If tidal forces existed, then the pressure of water and air would certainly react to this, especially during the parade of the planets.
Darwin and Laplace scattered with their research the belief that the Moon influences the barometer with its attraction.
Does the gravity of the moon create two atmospheric humps, at what speed does the air tidal hump move from east to west? Like cyclones and anticyclones manage to move from west to east, at a speed of 50 km / h, rubbing the surface of the continents while the lunar air tidal wave, moving from east to west at a speed of 1600km / h.
Do two air tides form in the mountain cabin every day, does the speed and direction of the wind change, because moving the atmosphere is much easier than water?
Also, there is no convincing evidence and facts, deformation of the Earth's continents under the action of tidal forces.
Although the deformation of the continents can be easily checked by aiming with a telescope at the top of a mountain or at a geostationary satellite.
Quite often, airplanes move along the equator toward the moon and against the moon when the sun is at the top and the tidal force would be noticed by pilots on fuel consumption and flight time ..
It is believed that the maximum ebb and flow are in the new moon due to the fact that the Moon and the Sun act by gravity on the Earth in one direction. But in reality, the Moon revolves around the Earth, then it speeds up the slowing down of the Earth’s orbital speed, so that on a new moon, the Earth’s orbital speed is maximum, and in a full moon, the minimum, as a result, the amplitude of the tidal wave changes, which clearly shows and reacts with the globe .
The gravity of the moon has no effect on the ebb and flow.
The role of the moon is indirect, creating an uneven orbital velocity of the Earth ..
Once a year, the Earth approaches the Sun as close as possible to the Sun (perihelion), and the orbital speed of the Earth increases as much as possible and as a result, the height of tides and ebbs increases, and the gravitational and centrifugal forces also increase in perihelion, but they are mutually balanced.
The orbital velocity of the Earth at perihelion is 30.27 km / s and at aphelion 29.27 km / s.
It is believed that the tidal forces stopped the rotation of the moon, and now it rotates synchronously. But there are more than 300 known satellites and why they all stopped at the same time and where did the force that rotated the satellites go ...
If the "Lunar tidal current" existed, it would really quickly stop the rotation of the Earth, since enormous energy would be expended on the ebb and flow. And the energy of the western transfer of the atmosphere, which rotates the Earth, is not so high as to rotate and knead the Earth, like a concrete mixer ..
Tidal forces today are successfully used as a plug from many secrets of nature.
But in fact, they exist only theoretically, and in practice, not a single gravimetric device recorded them.
The acceleration of gravity at the equator is less than at the poles: at the equator is 978 Gal, and at the poles - 983 Gal.
There is no data on the fluctuation of tidal forces; if there were fluctuations, there would be data.
Why in the phase of the new moon, the pendulum clock does not go slowly ..
A geostationary satellite of the Earth speaking as part of the Earth is in weightlessness, at a distance of 35 thousand km. from the Earth, and for some reason, is not subject to tidal influence of the Moon, despite the fact that the "tidal force" in the Earth-satellite system is 5 times more than on Earth.
https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit
If the oceans and continents that are under the satellite, the moon raises, "at 0.5 m, then the satellite which is in weightlessness, the moon should easily attract to itself, especially during the new moon, and the parade of planets.
And it is not necessary to forget that the oceans and continents are attracted by the Earth, and the satellite is in weightlessness ..
What theory or experiment proves that the gravity of the planets is infinite?
The formula F = Gm1m2 / r2 does not prove that gravity is infinite.
The law of the world says that the force of gravitational attraction between two material points is proportional to both masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation
And not a word about infinite gravity.
If the gravity of the Earth reached the Sun, then the Earth would have burned down long ago.
What will the formula of gravitational force look like if the gravity of the earth reaches no more than 50,000,000 km, and the moon 100,000 km?