# The universe is a mathematical construct

Our universe is completely infinite, it can only be measured by faith. If this world changes forever, and you don't go out there too far into the infinity and just keep to the people you can remember, of course God can talk to everyone but not see them, but when they all say something at once he still can't see or remember them without forgetting old things that deserve to live, but he can hear, so just be the angels.

Last edited:
Our universe is completely infinite, it can only be measured by faith.
You're posting this is the wrong subforum. Try "Religion".

If this world changes forever, and you don't go out there too far into the infinity and just keep to the people you can remember, of course God can talk to everyone but not see them, but when they all say something at once he still can't see or remember them without forgetting old things that deserve to live, but he can hear, so just be the angels.
What does any of this have to do with the universe being (or not being) a mathematical construct?

and you don't go out there too far into the infinity
Would three quarters of the way to infinity be safe? I understand some people measure distances in the time it takes to smoke a certain number of cigarettes, that is, something like, that's a four cigarette hike.
Being a non-smoker, I prefer to use sandwiches to judge a distance. long trips require a big hamper. Very long trips can be measured in hampers rather than individual sandwiches.
of course God can talk to everyone but not see them, but when they all say something at once he still can't see or remember them without forgetting old things that deserve to live, but he can hear, so just be the angels.
And you know this because??

river said:
Highlighted

Physical isn't just word . It has substance . Before any relational value you need real substance . You are substance . We are all substance . The Universe is about substance .

No, noooo...! It is the value that gives a physical item its substance.
Substance = Substance. There, happy now?

Highlighted

Wrong

It is the physical substance that gives meaning to value . Without Physical Substance ; Value would Not exist in the first place .

Last edited:
It is the physical substance that gives meaning to value . Without Physical Substance ; Value would Not exist in the first place .
Zero has no value, therefore it has no substance, mass, or gravity.
One has the value of a singularity, therefore it has substance, but not necessarily mass and/or gravity.

Substance is a subjective experience. Substance is only "experienced" by larger substances with mass and gravity.

Neutrino
The mass of the neutrino is much smaller than that of the other known elementary particles.[1] The weak force has a very short range, the gravitational interaction is extremely weak, and neutrinos do not participate in the strong interaction.[4] Thus, neutrinos typically pass through normal matter unimpeded and undetected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

The existence of neutrinos, suggests the existence of neutronium
Neutronium (sometimes shortened to neutrium,[1] also referred to as neutrite[2]) is a hypothetical substance composed purely of neutrons. The word was coined by scientist Andreas von Antropoff in 1926 (before the discovery of the neutron) for the hypothetical "element of atomic number zero" (with zero protons in its nucleus) that he placed at the head of the periodic table (denoted by dash, no element symbol)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutronium

Last edited:
Our universe is completely infinite, .
In actual fact, we still do not have conclusive evidence one way or the other, about whether the universe is finite or infinite.
All we know is that it is outstandingly BIG! or as I like saying, near infinite in extent and content.

Zero has no value, therefore it has no substance.
One has the value of a singularity, therefore it has substance, but not necessarily mass and gravity.

Substance is a subjective experience. Substance is only "experienced" by larger substances with mass and gravity.
A neutrino has a value of 1/2, hence there is value but no substantial mass or gravity. This is why they do not respond to gravity which gives substance to objects.

Neutrino https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

Highlighted

Disagree

Substance , Physical Substance , is of what the Universe is Made . Micro and Macro forms . It is the Micro that makes the Macro .

Substance , Physical Substance , is of what the Universe is Made . Micro and Macro forms . It is the Micro that makes the Macro .
Substance is a pure form of matter as listed in the Table of Elements.
Anything smaller than atoms, is not considered to be substantial matter.

Substance is a pure form of matter as listed in the Table of Elements.
Anything smaller than atoms, is not considered to be substantial matter.

Says who ? You ?

The term 'substance' is fairly common and tends to be used with several different meanings in everyday language. However, in the world of physical science, a substance is simply a pure form of matter. In other words, a substance is matter that contains only one type of atom or molecule.

And therefore what .....? What is your point ?

And therefore what .....? What is your point ?
If you have already forgotten the subject matter, I'm not going to waste any more time.

river said:
And therefore what .....? What is your point ?

If you have already forgotten the subject matter, I'm not going to waste any more time.

You stated the obvious .

And more really , the subatomic and the sub of the sub-atomic .

You stated the obvious .

And more really , the subatomic and the sub of the sub-atomic .
Then what are you complaining about? Hearing truth?

river said:
You stated the obvious .

And more really , the subatomic and the sub of the sub-atomic .

Then what are you complaining about? Hearing truth?

Nothing , really

Lets hear the truth .

Last edited:
From post#88 by Write4U

Write4U said:
Substance is a pure form of matter as listed in the Table of Elements.
Anything smaller than atoms, is not considered to be substantial matter.

Still think so Write4U

You stated the obvious .
Stating the obvious to you, is actually compulsory. I and others had to state the obvious that the Moon rotates on its axis as per the same period as its orbit about Earth. That's just for starters.

Stating the obvious to you, is actually compulsory. I and others had to state the obvious that the Moon rotates on its axis as per the same period as its orbit about Earth. That's just for starters.

Did you know that the Moon does not move for three days at some point in its Orbit ? For Three Days the Moon does not move , for three days . Why ?

You're posting this is the wrong subforum. Try "Religion".

What does any of this have to do with the universe being (or not being) a mathematical construct?

Ifinity cant be counted forever before you lose count, it is a mathematical algorithm.

Did you know that the Moon does not move for three days at some point in its Orbit ? For Three Days the Moon does not move , for three days . Why ?
There is no why...It's total unmitigated bullshit, that you probably got from the same source as your atomic war on Mars between Alien species.