Tina Turner: Anti-White Racist

Prince_James

Plutarch (Mickey's Dog)
Registered Senior Member
On a recent trip to South Africa along the likes of Oprah and others, Ms. Thunderdome noted:

"I don't think we have to please the white people of this country."

This country in which whites are oppressed and subjected to tremendous amounts of crime with little, to no, governmental reprisal of the animal perpetrators.
 
Remember now ...it's okay for blacks to be racist against whites ...it's the other way around where it's bad. :D

Baron Max
 
Isn't Tina Turner a black Muslim woman? Come to think of it so is Nation of Islam's Lois Farrakhan an anti white racist.
 
Remember now ...it's okay for blacks to be racist against whites ...it's the other way around where it's bad. :D

Baron Max

Oh yeah i forgot.
Hey , what would happen if there was a white history month?
As opposed to the already existant Black history month here in America?
 
No, it's stupid. People are likened to monkeys because they have meeting under a tree? WTF?
 
As I recall, Ms. Turner's significant other of many, many years is a white male.

I would think that she was saying that white racists deserve no special protection from reactionary black racists.

I would think that she understands that reaction is a two-way street.
 
No, it's stupid. People are likened to monkeys because they have meeting under a tree? WTF?

The site didn't start off that way, but lately it has become less and less PC. I think the writers snapped after writing about the massive black on white crime day after day.

However, the site is useful in demonstrating what a hellhole that country has become and the idea that whites aren't "oppressed" there is ridiculous.
 
Under fire for its record on crime, South Africa's government argues it is difficult to extend post-apartheid law enforcement across a country with a police structure that was originally set up only to protect a white minority ruling class from a disenfranchised black African majority.

That's from your link! Those whities don't have their SS troops any more. Now they might realize how the other half of their society lived during apartheid. All of society is sharing the same conditions, and now they have to deal with it. One could always make the case that a totalitarian regime could keep the public peace, but at what price?
 
Under fire for its record on crime, South Africa's government argues it is difficult to extend post-apartheid law enforcement across a country with a police structure that was originally set up only to protect a white minority ruling class from a disenfranchised black African majority.

That's from your link! Those whities don't have their SS troops any more. Now they might realize how the other half of their society lived during apartheid. All of society is sharing the same conditions, and now they have to deal with it. One could always make the case that a totalitarian regime could keep the public peace, but at what price?

The idea that the police only dealt with crime in white areas during Apartheid is ridiculous. After Apartheid crime shyrocketed for everyone there.
 
The site didn't start off that way, but lately it has become less and less PC. I think the writers snapped after writing about the massive black on white crime day after day.

However, the site is useful in demonstrating what a hellhole that country has become and the idea that whites aren't "oppressed" there is ridiculous.

I'm curious. If they are so oppressed, why don't they move?
 
SamCDKey:

Many are moving, actually. It's a pity, as the only people working towards the future of South Africa as anything but an AIDS-ridden rape-fest, are the whites.

Also: They shouldn't have to move, becaus it is, after all, their land. The Boers have been there for well over 300 years, even in areas where there were no blacks to begin with.

James R.:

As far as I am aware, that was her entire quote. It was on the television with no added context.
 
SamCDKey:

Many are moving, actually. It's a pity, as the only people working towards the future of South Africa as anything but an AIDS-ridden rape-fest, are the whites.

Also: They shouldn't have to move, becaus it is, after all, their land. The Boers have been there for well over 300 years, even in areas where there were no blacks to begin with.

huh?
South Africa contains some of the oldest archaeological sites in Africa. Extensive fossil remains at the Sterkfontein, Kromdraai and Makapansgat caves suggest that various australopithecines existed in South Africa from about three million years ago. These were succeeded by various species of Homo, including Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern man, Homo sapiens. Bantu-speaking peoples (here, Bantu is a linguistic term, not an ethnic one), iron-using agriculturists and herdsmen, moved south of the Limpopo River into modern-day South Africa by the fourth or fifth century (the Bantu expansion) displacing the original Khoi and San speakers. They slowly moved south and the earliest ironworks in modern-day KwaZulu-Natal Province are believed to date from around 1050.
 
On a recent trip to South Africa along the likes of Oprah and others, Ms. Thunderdome noted:

"I don't think we have to please the white people of this country."

This country in which whites are oppressed and subjected to tremendous amounts of crime with little, to no, governmental reprisal of the animal perpetrators.
I can't find it anywhere, any link?
 
Back
Top