Towards Ideas on a Quantum Theory of Gravity

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think this farce has gone on long enough... at the very least, this is certainly not physics, and belongs in pseudoscience.
 
I will argue, this is not mainstream physics, but to say it belongs in pseudoscience, is intellectual dishonesty.

No one who has challenged this seems to be able to do so coherently - NotEinstein has demonstrated repeatedly he does not understand the physics or the math.

So what grounds do you have Kittamaru?
 
I will argue, this is not mainstream physics, but to say it belongs in pseudoscience, is intellectual dishonesty.

No one who has challenged this seems to be able to do so coherently - NotEinstein has demonstrated repeatedly he does not understand the physics or the math.

So what grounds do you have Kittamaru?

For starters - you cannot simply add and remove characters from an equation at will and expect others to follow you. Your attitude has been, at best, simply abysmal in this thread. Not to mention you are a dead ringer for a sockpuppet, both in content and phrasing of posts. At this point, I've tossed it up the ladder to get additional input on it.
 
No one who has challenged this seems to be able to do so coherently - NotEinstein has demonstrated repeatedly he does not understand the physics or the math.
Says the person that had to be pointed to a missing minus-sign multiple times before he even considered it needing to be there. Says the person that started tensor-ing scalars because of what you claim is a perfectly good and understandable notation.

But let's look at your ability to do physics then. At least try, because I've seen you do so little of it so far.

That's me done for the day, though I got to write a little on the Bianchi identities, the real revelation the last few days is how bad NotEinstein's physics is. The cutest remark he made was about the ''last two missing gamma matrices'' - this was the real ice breaker for me, I knew then he has no idea about my model, let alone the math.
Even there you still mess up copy pasting. I know that's not a direct quote, because I wouldn't call Christoffel symbols "Gamma matrices", because:
1) they are not matrices;
2) that term refers to Dirac matrices.
Now before you say this is not a misunderstanding of physics: it's a total disregard for clearly communicating physics, and connecting the two literally just because they use the same Greek letter (not even the same capitalization!) is, as you would say, laughable. So I wonder... is this your confusion that lead you to try to connect commutator relations to Christoffel symbols? I may be onto something here!
 
For starters - you cannot simply add and remove characters from an equation at will and expect others to follow you. Your attitude has been, at best, simply abysmal in this thread. Not to mention you are a dead ringer for a sockpuppet, both in content and phrasing of posts. At this point, I've tossed it up the ladder to get additional input on it.



Add and remove what characters?

You want people to follow me, but you put my work in pseudoscience, which is more or less trying to publically denounce my work, no?

You leave my thread to have progress up till this point, but now you act like some kind of authority on the matter? I was doing quite well before you butted in, thanks.
 
The mistakes NonEinstein has made have been embarrassing and people may have been learning something, before you came in here with your big boats on, Kittamaru.
 
The mistakes NonEinstein has made have been embarrassing and people may have been learning something, before you came in here with your big boats on, Kittamaru.

*shrugs* Continue with your petty insults all you want - if you actually had any sort of factual point to make, you would have made it. As it is, you are just blowing smoke (again).

Your running away from someone pointing out perceived errors, instead of proving yourself correct with some sort of evidence, just nails it home.
 
*shrugs* Continue with your petty insults all you want - if you actually had any sort of factual point to make, you would have made it. As it is, you are just blowing smoke (again).


I have made loads of factual points ... none of which you seem interested in.
 
Kittimaru, these are not insults - I have asked you on what grounds you put it here - can you even answer that? You said in my other post, it was being revisited then shut my other post down like a little bitch.

They are not insults, its how it is.
 
Kittimaru, these are not insults - I have asked you on what grounds you put it here - can you even answer that? You said in my other post, it was being revisited then shut my other post down like a little bitch.

They are not insults, its how it is.

Sorry Reiku/SimonsCat/Trapped and the handful of other handles you have gone by over the months, but I don't really give enough of a fuck to argue with you.

As such, consider this locked as well, pending review by the rest of the moderation team.
 
Admin note: Geon has been banned from sciforums as one more sock puppet of an ex-member who has been banned several times previously.

To Geon/Reiku: you would do better to learn some physics rather than pretending to be an expert. You're wasting your own time and the time of other people on forums like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top