TY-Gravity

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by TonyYuan, Apr 30, 2023.

  1. TonyYuan Gravitational Fields and Gravitational Waves Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    852
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,370
    Here we go again.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. TonyYuan Gravitational Fields and Gravitational Waves Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    852
    I can fix Newton's law of gravitation, but I can't do anything about ignorant and arrogant people.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. TonyYuan Gravitational Fields and Gravitational Waves Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    852
    Your thread TY-Gravity was moved to a different forum. Reason: Moved to a more suitable subforum
    This is the only thing GR cultists can do, this world is fooled and controlled by GR cultists.
     
  8. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,598
    Well, no. GR "cultists" can also accurately predict time distortion caused by relativistic effects in GPS satellites. Tinfoil hatters can't.
     
  9. TonyYuan Gravitational Fields and Gravitational Waves Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    852
    • Please do not insult other members
    Western physical science is shameless to such an extent. Don't you feel ashamed?

    This is a science forum controlled by a bunch of physics idiots.
     
  10. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,598
    Nope.
    If everyone you meet has the same opinion of your woo - the problem might not be them.
     
  11. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,237
    It's not broken (other than to the extent that GR "fixes" it). It doesn't need your help.

    Besides, your work - the work you have shown us here - appears to be worthless pseudoscience. That sort of thing won't fix anything.
    Don't you feel ashamed that you've wasted so much time producing "work" that is scientifically worthless?

    You should have taken the advice of the many reviewers who told you why your work is unpublishable, instead of trying to ad hominem them.
    Coming from you, Tony, I think we can almost take that as a compliment.

    Clearly, you can't tell the difference between a physics idiot and a genius.
     

Share This Page