The rules for such a committee are linked here in this thread http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=2911404#post2911404 - we have one believer (myself) and one skeptic (Jdawg) already. We require (atleast two more skeptics and 2 more believers). There can be more so long as both sides have equal count of members.
We will require a panel of judges, two possible believers of the phenomenon and two possible skeptics of the phenomenon. I have in mind perhaps some moderators might be good conduct here.
I would like to see whether spider goat, (alphanumeric should be present to manage the scientific side of things, or by another scientific sciforums poster), we require a judging panel with some various backgrounds so that there is a reasonale array of professionals in their own area. If not, so be it, but it would help the ruling on some cases.
If you are interested, just leave a message.
thank you!
We will require a panel of judges, two possible believers of the phenomenon and two possible skeptics of the phenomenon. I have in mind perhaps some moderators might be good conduct here.
I would like to see whether spider goat, (alphanumeric should be present to manage the scientific side of things, or by another scientific sciforums poster), we require a judging panel with some various backgrounds so that there is a reasonale array of professionals in their own area. If not, so be it, but it would help the ruling on some cases.
If you are interested, just leave a message.
thank you!