UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by Magical Realist, Oct 10, 2017.

  1. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,237
    Moderator note: Magical Realist has been warned for trolling.

    Due to accumulated warning points, MR will be taking an extended break from sciforums once again.
    ---


    It was unwise of MR to double down on the same offence that got him a one week ban last time around, by posting his post #9333, above, followed by #9338.

    That post demonstrates no understanding on his part about why he was warned last time, despite my careful explanation to him in private messaging and despite a conversation we had about that there. Instead, he chose to come back and straight away claim that he was not trolling. It also demonstrates no repetence on his part and no desire to change his behaviour.


    This, however, is not why he finds himself banned again.

    This time around, MR falsely accused DaveC of losing an argument and then "crying troll" because he lost the argument. His aim was clearly to try to provoke an angry reaction from DaveC, and to lie to other readers about DaveC and to make false claims about said "argument" that he falsely claims that DaveC lost. Both of these acts constitute trolling, as well as breaching our site posting guidelines relating to knowingly telling lies.

    It is monumentally stupid for him to claim that he was banned for "no reason" when the reason is posted clear as day in this thread and was discussed with him at some length in private messaging. The whole "no reason" thing is just one more lie, knowingly told.

    So, we might see more of MR next year. Perhaps there is a new year's resolution he could consider adding to his list.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    It’s those ‘Speeding balloons’ again. Or, wow look at how this uap ascends and descends so quickly.

    This is a good example of movement of drone and camera.


    So what is it?
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2023
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,885
    That's a pretty impressive analysis.
    It is alarming (even to me, who is familiar with drones) just how convincingly a target can appear to exhibit complex or intelligent movement, when in fact, it is the camera doing the moving.

    All video sightings after the advent of drones will need to be passed through the "drone artifact" filter before they can be cartgorized as anomalous.

    Playing Devils' Advocate, since MR is not here: this does not prove that the flying orb videos are due to drone movement - i.e. the orbs are not technically debunked - it simply proves one more (albeit compelling) alternate mundane explanation.

    But what it does do is remove the flying orb videos from the arsenal of those who would say "there's 'definitely' something happening in our skies that needs explaining."
     
    foghorn likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    Exactly, each uap event should be individually analysed.
     
  8. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,885
    Indeed. It completely upends the "silver orb" videos that are currently the hotness (including earlier in this thread).



    Looking at it with fresh eyes, there is no way to conclude that the object in the video is moving at all. It is quite consistent with a stationary object, such as a balloon, being recorded by a moving drone.

    (By the way, there is no indication the orbs are "silver" either. Look at the contrast of other things in the backgroud of the scene. Very bright highlights, very dark shadows. Unless everything on the ground is "silver", it's apparent that the UAP is not necessarily silver at all. It could be white, or black. It could be sky blue and practically invisible from the ground.)


    The one in the analysis is, in fact, a balloon (positive ID)

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    And it is shown to be quite blatantly moving back and forth - rapidly and seemingly with purpose.
    (see 4:10 - 4:30 in video)


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    The analysis in that video should be a cautionary tale about just how convincingly-strange things can appear - and yet still be mundane. It is testmant to the fact that even high quality, sharp, colour video can and does "lie".

    I can hear the echo of MR's LOL: "balloons usually don't reverse direction and act as if under control".



    Drones provide unprecedented zoom and stability footage that makes it difficult to interpret with traditional experience. Which means UFO enthusiats would do well to be even more cautious of over-reaching with their conclusions on erstwhile "compelling" cases.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2023
    foghorn likes this.
  9. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,885
    You know, it sure would be nice of the UAP enthusiasts here on this board would come out of hiding and make even a passing attempt at any hard analysis to back up their claims, as opposed to just rhetoric...

    We skeptics are showing a superhuman degree of tolerance for all the rhetoric that comes from the enthusiast camp. I sure hear a lot of sizzle, but so far, no bacon.
     
  10. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    I think they would much more like to talk about Mick West misleading people by sowing seeds of doubt, rather than showing where Mick is wrong in any of his analysis of uap events.
    And the other things they like to chat on about... What do we actually mean by the word 'evidence' and why we should trust an eyewitness.
    In other words, uaps are just too mysterious to analyse, so let talk about meanings of words instead.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2023
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,885
    This.
     
    foghorn likes this.
  12. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    I think the downwards motions that seem to appear to suddenly start and stop are interesting too, in that they suggest controlled movement.
    Start and stops at timestamps: 1:06, 1:24, and 1:30.
     
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,885
  14. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,477
    The best thing to come out of 2023 uap wise imo is the Navy streamlining and making easier the uap reporting process and helping to reduce the stigma surrounding them. Ex-Navy pilots such as Dave Fravor and Ryan Graves should be especially commended for their courageous testimony and their holding to their compelling eyewitness accounts of uaps. The creation of and additional reporting from the AARO about uaps and their commonly witnessed characteristics provides further validation of the importance of continued research into the uap phenomenon. Just having a respectful dialogue about them is definitely progress over the old standard Blue Book approach of military-led debunkery and mockery and cover-ups.
     
    Yazata, C C and DaveC426913 like this.
  15. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    It’s a pity those "whistleblowers" never and still have not taken the invite from Kirkpatrick to provide their "evidence" to the AARO.


    Article by Sean Kirkpatrick in Scientific American.
    Two days old.
    He explains one of the reasons he stepped down last December.

    January 19, 2024
    " As of the time of my departure, none, let me repeat, none of the conspiracy-minded “whistleblowers” in the public eye had elected to come to AARO to provide their “evidence” and statement for the record despite numerous invitations. Anyone that would rather be sensationalist in the public eye than bring their evidence to the one organization established in law with all of the legal process and security framework established to protect them, their privacy, and the information and to investigate and report out findings is suspect. "

    "Carl Sagan popularized the maxim that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” This advice should not be optional for policy makers. In today’s world of misinformation, conspiracy driven decision-making and sensationalist-dominated governance, our capacity for rational, evidence-based critical thinking is eroding, with deleterious consequences for our ability to effectively deal with multiplying challenges of ever increasing complexity.

    As director of the Department of Defense’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), charged by Congress in 2022 to help bring science-based clarity and resolution to the long-standing mystery surrounding credible observations of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), also known as UFOs, I experienced this erosion up close and personal. And it was one factor in my decision to step down from my position last December."

    " The conspiracists’ story goes something like this: The U.S. has been hiding and attempting to reverse engineer as many as 12 UAP/UFOs from as early as the 1960s and perhaps earlier. This great cover-up and conspiracy failed to produce any salient results, and consequently the effort was abandoned to some private sector defense contractors to continue the work. Sometime later, the story continues, those private sector contractors wanted to bring the whole program back under U.S. government (USG) auspices. Apparently, the CIA stopped this supposed transfer back to the USG. All of this is without substantiating evidence, but, alas, belief in a statement is directly proportional to the volume in which it is transmitted and the number of times it is repeated, not the actual facts.
    During a full-scale, year-long investigation of this story (which has been told and retold by a small group of interconnected believers and others with possibly less than honest intentions—none of whom have firsthand accounts of any of this), AARO discovered a few things, and none were about aliens. "
    Read on...


    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-what-i-learned-as-the-u-s-governments-ufo-hunter/
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2024
    James R, exchemist and C C like this.
  16. C C Consular Corps - "the backbone of diplomacy" Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,241
    As expected, part of the mythology stems from "ordinary" special access programs where the only shared trait with "alien bodies/tech conspiracies" is the secrecy.

    "The report demonstrates that many of the circulating allegations described above derive from inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures of legitimate U.S. programs or related R&D that have nothing to do with extraterrestrial issues or technology. Some are misrepresentations, and some derive from pure, unsupported beliefs. In many respects, the narrative is a textbook example of circular reporting, with each person relaying what they heard, but the information often ultimately being sourced to the same small group of individuals."​

    And this "new era of investigation" is also predictably dashing the naïve hopes of enthusiasts, bit by bit, just as Project Blue Book and earlier Project Sign did.
    _
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2024
    foghorn likes this.
  17. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    Yes, now we have to wait for that AARO report.
    "One of my last acts before retiring was to sign AARO’s Historical Record Report Volume 1, which is currently being prepared for delivery to Congress and the public. The report demonstrates that many of the circulating allegations described above derive from inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures of legitimate U.S. programs or related R&D that have nothing to do with extraterrestrial issues or technology. "
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-what-i-learned-as-the-u-s-governments-ufo-hunter/
     
  18. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,885
    Tic tac report: SOLVED!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    foghorn and James R like this.

Share This Page